道德的法律强制与代孕规制的可能限度

Legal Enforcement of Morals and Potential Limits of Surrogacy Regulation

以非商业完全代孕为标准评估模型,基于社会合作的基本特征,可以得出代孕的合理性。非商业代孕的反对者有故意夸大代孕的损害风险和伦理风险的嫌疑。即便如此,生殖能力的运用方式与人们所重视的关系或规划关联密切,应该得到法律的重视和回应。商业代孕因其商业属性会逼迫人们在这一问题上做选择,并试图改变人们的生活方式,更容易带来额外风险,而非商业完全代孕因为其审慎且精细化的处理方式而应该被允许。法律对代孕的态度不一定是“全有”或“全无”的关系,在形式上允许而在内容上严格限制是其中较为合理的方案。

Based on the non-commercial gestational-surrogacy as a benchmark evaluation model and the basic characteristics of social cooperation,the legitimacy of surrogacy can be justified.Opponents of non-commercial surrogacy are suspected of intentionally exaggerating the risks of harm and the ethical risks.Even so,the ways in which reproductive capacity is used is closely related to the relationships and plans that people value,so they should be given legal attention and response.Commercial surrogacy,because of its commercial attribute,is more likely to force individuals to make choices on this issue and attempt to change people's lifestyles,which may bring additional risks.Non-commercial gestational-surrogacy without commercial factors should be allowed because of its prudent and refined handling.The attitude of law to surrogacy does not necessarily have to be an"all or nothing"relationship,and a more reasonable approach is to formally allow it with strict limitations in content.