期刊文献+

体系化与去技术化:我国环境法典编纂目的论

Systematization and De-technology:The Teleology of Codification of China's Environmental Code
下载PDF
导出
摘要 马克思主义哲学强调目的具有能动性,正是因为目的具有能动性,使得主体活动具有方向性,是故环境法典编纂目的反映了预期中环境法典的成果。总览世界范围内的法典编纂历史,对法典编纂目的论的研究始终居于基础性地位受到广泛重视。丰富环境法编纂目的论的内涵是完善我国环境法典学理基础的必然选择。将去技术化纳入环境法典编纂的目的,直面了环境法对开放性的诉求与法典的稳定性之间的矛盾,对解决环境法典编纂一元目的论的痛点有所裨益,有助更好地证成环境法典编纂的必要性,对探寻环境法典制定的最优方案有所助力。 Marxist philosophy emphasizes that the purpose has initiative,and it is precisely because the purpose has the initiative that the main activity has directionality,so the purpose of the environmental code codification reflects the expected results of the environmental code.Looking back at the history of codification worldwide,the study of the teleology of codification has always been a fundamental position and has received extensive attention.Enriching the connotation of the teleology of environmental law codification is an inevitable choice to improve the theoretical foundation of China's environmental code.The purpose of incorporating de-technology into the codification of the environmental code directly faces the contradiction between the demand for openness of environmental law and the stability of the code,which is beneficial to solving the pain points of the monistic teleology of environmental code codification,helping to better prove the necessity of environmental code codification,and to explore the optimal plan for the formulation of environmental codes.
作者 吕志祥 付秋池 LV Zhi-xiang;FU Qiu-chi(Law School of Lanzhou University of Technology,Lanzhou 730050,China)
出处 《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024年第1期80-87,共8页 Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目“黄河流域绿色发展的法治协调机制研究”(20BKS075)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 目的论 环境法典 法典化 法律规范体系化 科学立法 teleology environmental code administrative procedure systematization of legal norms scientific legislation
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献321

共引文献584

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部