“叠加”抑或“挤出”:累加任务影响地方政府行为的多重效应分析

"Superposition"or"Extrusion":Multiple Effects of Cumulative Task on Local Government Behavior

运动式治理是一种具有中国特色的治理机制,在现实中有着广泛运用。既有研究强调,运动式治理的存在对地方政府行为的诸多方面产生了深刻影响。然而,地方政府并非是一个既定的完整统一体,运动式治理给地方政府带来的微观影响需要进一步打开和细化分析。本文基于协作关系的认识,对运动式治理的本质加以剖析,认为“累加任务”是运动式治理基于特定目标,为地方政府组织带来的、相对于原有科层任务出现的“新任务”,对地方政府的常规行为有着“叠加”抑或“挤出”的影响。本文以Y市创建国家卫生城市为案例,论述Y市地方政府微观部门在累加任务影响下的动态行为变化,具体表现为统领部门、核心职能部门、边缘职能部门及基层地方政府在组织流程、组织绩效及组织理念方面受到了不同程度的影响。有鉴于此,文章提炼了关于累加任务影响地方政府行为的深层机理,归纳了累加任务政治性、优先性及灵活性如何影响地方政府行为的逻辑解释,为理解运动式治理和累加任务提供了新视角,在地方政府治理研究的道路上向前迈进。

Campaign-Style governance is a governance mechanism with Chinese characteristics,which is widely used in reality.Existing studies emphasize that the existence of Campaign-Style governance has a profound impact on many aspects of local government behavior.However,local government is not an established and complete entity,and the micro impact of Campaign-Style governance on local government needs to be further opened and analyzed.After a dialogue with the relevant literature of"Conventional Governance"and"Campaign-Style governance",based on the understanding of the cooperative relationship,this paper analyzes the essence of Campaign-Style governance,and puts forward that"Cumulative Task"is a"new task"brought by Campaign-Style governance to local government organizations based on specific goals,which is relative to the original bureaucratic tasks,and has an"Superposition"or"Extrusion"impact on the conventional behavior of local governments.Taking Y City as a case,this paper discusses the dynamic behavior changes of the micro departments of the local government of Y City under the influence of cumulative task,which are specifically reflected in the influence of the leading department,the core functional department,the marginal functional department and the grass-roots local government in terms of organizational process,organizational performance and organizational philosophy.In view of this,this paper refines the deep mechanism of cumulative task affecting local government behavior,and summarizes the logical explanation of how the political nature,priority and flexibility of cumulative task affect local government behavior,which provides a new perspective for understanding Campaign-Style governance and cumulative task,and moves forward on the road of local government governance research.However,this paper only discusses the representative departments of local government,and fails to have a comprehensive display and analysis.At the same time,the relevant personality factors were not taken into account,which needs to be further supplemented in the follow-up study.