刑事裁判文书证据认证说理问题研究

Research on the Reasoning of Evidence Authentication in Criminal Judgment Documents

加强刑事裁判文书证据认证说理是提高司法公信力和维护司法权威的有效途径。证据是裁判的起点和基础。法官应根据案件具体情况和证据争议大小,对证据列示、采纳和认证全过程详略得当地予以展示,以缓解文书工作的重压,回应当事人对公平正义的期待。实践中,证据认证说理存在过程不明、争点模糊与信息缺失等问题,法官自身的因素与制度内含的缺憾共同导致了这一现象。证据认证说理改革,应明晰说理的模态、内容和底线,借助最新科技手段,变通现行制度内容,并辅以详实的归责机制和考核激励举措,以真正激发法官持续追求绵密说理的动力。

Strengthening the evidence certification and reasoning of criminal judgment documents is an effective way to improve judicial credibility and maintain judicial authority.Evidence is the starting point and foundation of judgement.The judge should show the whole process of evidence presentation,adoption and certification in detail according to the specific circumstances of the case and the size of the evidence dispute,so as to alleviate the pressure of the paperwork and respond to the expectations of the parties for fairness and justice.In practice,there are some problems in the process of evidence authentication and reasoning,such as unclear process,vague points of contention and lack of information.The judge's own factors and the defects contained in the system have led to this phenomenon.The reform of evidence certification and reasoning should clarify the mode,content and bottom line of reasoning,with the help of the latest scientific and technological means.And the reform should adapt the content of the current system,supplemented by detailed imputation mechanism and assessment incentive measures,so as to truly stimulate the judges to continue to pursue the motivation of dense reasoning.