期刊文献+

新型变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉设计以及在腰椎改良皮质骨轨迹的应用

Design of a Novel Variable-Diameter Cortical Threaded Screw and its Application in Improving Cortical Bone Trajectory in Lumbar Spine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 设计一款用于改良皮质骨轨迹(modified cortical bone trajectory,MCBT)置钉技术的新型变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉,验证新型变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉在MCBT技术中的力学特性。方法 根据MCBT技术,设计螺钉的螺距为2 mm,全长45 mm,粗杆部分直径恒定5.5 mm,细杆部分直径为4.0~4.5 mm变径,粗杆和细杆连接的变径位置长度为2 mm。从变径位置、螺纹深度、螺纹类型3个方面设置参数,开展三因素三水平L9正交试验,并建立螺钉模型。基于有限元方法对设计的螺钉进行扭转、弯曲和拔出力计算,对结果进行极差分析并确定螺钉模型。建立骨质疏松标本L4椎体三维模型,并按照MCBT技术置钉。比较新型变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉和常规非变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉抗拔出力。结果 通过极差分析,得出螺钉6(变径位置距离螺钉头部24 mm,螺纹深度0.7 mm,螺纹类型为45°对称螺纹)为最优螺钉。在抗拔出力方面,第6款变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉比4.5 mm常规非变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉提高13.1%,与5.5 mm常规非变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉相比不具有统计学差异。结论 螺钉变径位置对螺钉拔出力影响最小,螺纹类型对拔出力影响最大,螺纹深度对扭转、弯曲影响最大。与常规非变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉相比,变径全皮质骨螺纹螺钉前端较细,可避免进钉点发生劈裂;螺钉后端直径较粗,具有较好的抗拔出力性能。研究结果为MCBT技术的临床应用提供新的理论基础。 Objective A novel variable-diameter cortical threaded screw used in a modified cortical bone trajectory(MCBT) was designed to verify its mechanical properties using the MCBT technique.Methods According to MCBT technology,the screw pitch was fixed at 2 mm,the total length was 45 mm,the diameter of the thick rod was 5.5 mm,the diameter of the thin rod was 4.0-4.5 mm,and the length of variable-diameter position connecting the thick rod and the thin rod was 2 mm.The parameters were set based on three aspects:variable-diameter position,thread depth,and thread type.Three-factor and three-level L9 tests were conducted and screw models were established.The torsion and the bending and pull-out force of the designed screws were calculated based on the finite element method,the results were analyzed using range analysis,and then the screw models were determined.The three-dimensional(3D) model of L4 vertebral body in osteoporosis specimens was established and screws were placed according to the MCBT technique.The pull-out force of the novel variable-diameter cortical threaded screw was compared with that of a conventional non-variable-diameter cortical threaded screw.Results Range analysis showed that screw No.6(variable-diameter position:24 mm from the screw head,thread depth:0.7 mm,45° symmetrical thread) was the optimal screw.The anti-pull-out force of the No.6 variable-diameter cortical threaded screw was 13.1% higher than that of the 4.5 mm conventional non-variable-diameter cortical threaded screw,and no statistical difference in anti-pull-out force was found between the No.6 variable-diameter cortical threaded screw and the 5.5 mm conventional non-variable-diameter cortical threaded screw.Conclusions The variable-diameter position has the smallest influence on pull-out force of the screw,the thread type has the largest influence on pull-out force,and the thread depth has the largest influence on torsion and bending.Compared with that of the conventional non-variable-diameter cortical threaded screw,the variable-diameter cortical threaded screw had a smaller front end,which prevented splitting at the entrance point of the screw.The screw has a large diameter at rear end,thereby showing improved pull-out performance.The results provide a new theoretical basis for the clinical application of MCBT technology.
作者 张治豪 居来提·买提肉孜 张连鹏 肖扬 阿卜杜萨拉木·托合提 帕尔哈提·热西提 ZHANG Zhihao;Julaiti·MAITIROUZI;ZHANG Lianpeng;XIAO Yang;Abodusalamu·TUOHETI;Paerhati·REXITI(College of Intelligent Manufacturing,Xinjiang University,Urumqi 830017,China;Department of Spine Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China)
出处 《医用生物力学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期91-97,共7页 Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基金 中国医学科学院第三届中国健康长寿创新大赛项目资助项目(2022-JKCS-19)。
关键词 腰椎 改良皮质骨轨迹 螺钉设计 骨质疏松 lumbar spine modified cortical bone trajectory(MCBT) screw design osteoporosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1邱贵兴,孙世荃.同种异体骨植入材料的临床应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(10):635-637. 被引量:66
  • 2汪宇,潘滔.椎弓根钉内固定系统相关问题研究进展[J].国外医学(骨科学分册),2005,26(5):304-305. 被引量:3
  • 3孙世荃.骨移植的生物力学.组织移植通讯,2001,(2):13-16.
  • 4Karatzas P, Triantafyllou N, Doganis A, et al. The Effects of Dehydration and Rehydration on the Quality of ALlografts [J]. Radiation Sterilization: Irradiated Tissues and TheirPotential Clinical Use. Clwyd UK: 3~ne North E Wales In- stitute, 1978:141.
  • 5Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, et al. Tenenhouse A. A meta- analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone, 2004, 35(2) :375-382.
  • 6Tan JS, Kwon BK, Dvorak MF, et al. Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis. Spine, 2004, 29 (16) : 1723-1730.
  • 7Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, et al. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine, 1994, 19 (21) :2415-2420.
  • 8Magerl FP. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984, 189 : 125-141.
  • 9Gronholz MJ. Prevention, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis-related fracture : a multifactoral osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2008, 108(10) : 575-585.
  • 10Liu Z, Piao J, Pang L, et al. The diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis and the incidence of osteoporosis in China. J Bone Miner Metab, 2002, 20(4) : 181-189.

共引文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部