晚唐诗人储嗣宗或非储光羲曾孙

Chu Sizong May Not Be Chu Guangxi's Great-grandson

今存库本《姓纂》内容颇多脱漏讹误,且其中关于“(储)嗣宗”的部分记载疑为后人所羼,故其作为支撑“储嗣宗乃储光羲曾孙”观点的文献可靠性并不足;又从后期若干文献和相关历史事实推知,此处之“嗣宗”乃系“调宗”之讹,而与储光羲曾孙无涉;而储氏族谱对储大文判断的坚持,也侧面证明了此讹乃为几百年来储氏后学之公认;同时,储嗣宗诗歌中体现的吴越地域色彩,亦可有摆脱“储光羲曾孙”身份限制进行解读的可能性,故并不能成为储嗣宗储光羲关系绑定的旁证。

There are many mistakes in the existing book of Name Zuan,and a part of the written records of the"(Chu)Sizong"are now suspected to have been added by later people,so the book is not reliable enough;in addition,From the inference of the later documents and relevant historical facts,we can know that the word"Sizong"here should actually be the word"Tiaozong";And the support of Chu's genealogy for Chu Dawen's view,it can also prove that the the above statement is jointly recognized by the Chu family descendants for hundreds of years;At the same time,the regional color of Wu and Yue reflected in Chu Sizong's poems.It can not be a circumstantial evidence of the relationship between Chu Si and Chu Guangxi.