摘要
目的了解肿瘤多学科协作诊疗(multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment,MDT)的有效性评价研究,分析国内外有效性评价工具的发展现状以及差异,为后续肿瘤MDT的总结评价和持续改进、强化MDT监管提供借鉴与参考。方法检索国内外4个文献数据库以获取相关研究文献,并进行文献筛选和系统综述。结果最终纳入文献87篇,中文和英文文献分别为26篇和61篇,发表数量最多的年份是2020年,第一作者所属国家主要为英国。国外评价工具侧重于结构和过程的关键要素,国内评价体系侧重于结果层面的指标内容。结论在国内研究中,MDT评价指标选择的科学性和全面性有待提升,对MDT结构、过程层面的影响因素分析尚需加强,现有评价体系的外推性仍待验证。建议强化评价指标选择的证据支持,重视过程环节的评价,促进对肿瘤MDT影响因素的深入研究,进一步鼓励现有评价体系的实证应用。
Objective To understand the effectiveness evaluation research of tumor MDT,and analyze the development status and differences of evaluation tools at home and abroad,to provide reference for the subsequent summary evaluation and continuous improvement of tumor MDT,and the strengthening of MDT supervision.Methods Four literature databases at home and abroad were searched to obtain relevant literatures,and literature screening and systematic review were conducted.Results A total of 87 literatures were included,including 26literatures in Chinese and 61 literatures in English;the most published years were 2020;the main countries of the first authors were the UK.Foreign evaluation tools focus on the key elements of structure and process,while evaluation systems in China focus on the index content at the result level.Conclusion In China,the scientific and comprehensive selection of tumor MDT evaluation indicators needs to be improved,the analysis of influencing factors on the structure and process of MDT needs to be strengthened,and the extrapolation of the existing evaluation systems need to be verified.It is suggested to strengthen the evidence support of evaluation index selection,attach importance to the evaluation of process links,promote the in-depth study of the influencing factors of tumor MDT,and further encourage the empirical application of the existing evaluation system.
作者
李欣
赵阳
王贤吉
王盛
戎春宇
陈英耀
周萍
Li Xin;Zhao Yang;Wang Xianji;Zhou Ping(School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai,200032,China;不详)
出处
《中国医院管理》
北大核心
2024年第3期39-44,共6页
Chinese Hospital Management
关键词
肿瘤
多学科协作诊疗
评价工具
系统综述
tumor
multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment
evaluation tool
systematic review