摘要
元祐三年十二月,郓州州学教授周穜上书,请朝廷以王安石配享神宗庙庭。在当时朝中宰辅、台谏人事格局对熙丰臣僚有利,且太皇太后高氏和部分宰执努力“调停”新旧矛盾的背景下,熙丰臣僚意欲以此事进一步试探高氏及朝廷的态度。朝廷对此事的处置揭橥了高氏和部分宰执的“调停”是在维护元祐既定政治路线和“更化”正当性前提下的新旧和解,也是朝中各势力之间相互博弈妥协的结果。调和新旧之举虽有波折中断,然而并未破灭,一直延续到元祐末期,成为元祐政治的重要组成部分,但此举并未从根本上解决新旧两派的矛盾,反而加剧了元祐臣僚内部的党争和分裂。
According to the present paper,the imperial court's handling of Zhou Zhong's 1088 suggestion that Wang Ansh be correlated to Emperor Shen indicated that there was a compromise between the old school defending the established political line of Yuanyou reign(1086-1094) and the new school stressing the legitimacy of reform.But on the other hand,as the paper observed,the accommodation was not the solution but instead it exacerbated the political factionalism.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期81-95,215,共16页
Historical Review
