摘要
波斯纳法官和我应邀就不胜枚举的权利问题展开辩论。对此我处于一种不利的境地,因为我认为事先约定我们探讨的关于可以列举的宪法权利和不胜枚举的宪法权利的区别问题是一个不存在的虚假问题。我将解释为什么这个问题是一个不存在的虚假问题。
This paper,in a traditional way,analyzes the national constitutional dispute on abortion.The author thinks that this dispute is not about whether fetus should be considered as a person in a legal way,but is about whether the government should,or to what extent if they could,constrainedly introduce the views which they hold on the holiness of man's life.
出处
《清华法律评论》
2002年第1期176-207,共32页
Tsinghua Law Review