期刊文献+

达格列净治疗慢性肾病患者的成本-效用分析

Cost-utility analysis of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:大型随机对照试验已证实达格列净在慢性肾病中的有效性和安全性,因此有必要对达格列净治疗慢性肾病的经济性进行评价.方法:基于支付方角度,利用Markov模型分析加用达格列净治疗慢性肾病的成本效用.Markov模型参数来源于现有临床和经济学文献,循环周期为1年,模拟患者终身的直接医疗费用和质量调整生命年(QALYs).采用单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析评价结果的稳健性.结果:达格列净联合常规治疗组的终身费用为33.81万元,获得13.70 QALYs;常规治疗组的终身费用为37.15万元,获得13.37 QALYs.敏感性分析显示结果具有稳健性.结论:与单纯常规治疗相比,加用达格列净治疗慢性肾病更具有经济性. Objective:To evaluate the long-term economics of dapagliflozin for chronic kidney disease since a large randomized controlled trial has confirmed the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease.Therefore it is necessary to evaluate the economic efficacy of dapagliflozin in the treatment of chronic kidney disease.Methods:Based on Markov model,the economics of adding dapagliflozin for chronic kidney disease was evaluated from the payer's perspective.Markov model parameters came from published clinical and economic literature.Model cycle was one year.Simulate lifelong direct medical expenses and quality adjusted life years(QALYs).One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to check the robustness.Results:Markov model cohort analysis showed that in the dapagliflozin group,the patients could acquire 13.70 QALYs with 0.3381 million yuan while the conventional group would benefit 13.37 QALYs with 0.3715 million yuan.The sensitive analysis showed that the result was robust.Conclusion:Compared with the conventional treatment,adding dapagliflozin may be a better choice in the long run for chronic kidney disease.
作者 钟玲 邵华 ZHONG Ling;SHAO Hua(Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University,Nanjing 210009,China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期204-208,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 江苏省药学会正大天晴医院药学科研项目(Q202105)。
关键词 慢性肾病 达格列净 药物经济学 MARKOV模型 chronic kidney disease dapagliflozin pharmacoeconomic evaluation Markov model
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献49

  • 1王娟娟,叶露,胡善联,郝春鹏,韩凤.透析的疾病经济负担研究[J].中国卫生资源,2006,9(2):68-69. 被引量:24
  • 2中国国情网.2011年天津市国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].(2011-12-13).http://www.china.corn.cn/guo-qingr/2011-12/13/content_24144840_4.htm.
  • 3Yang W,Lu J ,et al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China[J]. N England J Med 2010, 362, 1090- 1101.
  • 4Henriksson F, Agardh C, Berne C. Direct medical costs for patients with type 2 diabetes in Sweden[J]. J Intern Med 2000,248:387-96.
  • 5Wang W,McGreevey W,Fu C,et al. Type 2 Diabetes in China: a preventable economic burden[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2009,15 (9): 593-601.
  • 6UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)[J]. Lancet 1998,352:837-53.
  • 7The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus[J]. N Engl J Med 1993,329:977-86.
  • 8Cryer P. Hypoglycemia is the limiting factor in the management of diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 1999,15 : 42-6.
  • 9Brito- Sanfiel M, Diago- Cabezudo J, Calderon A. Economic impact of hypoglycemia on healthcare in Spain. Expert Rev [J]. Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2010, 10 ( 6 ) : 649-60.
  • 10Amiel SA ,Dixon T,Mannt R,et al. Hypoglycemia in Type 2 diabetes[J]. Diabetic Medicine, 2008,25 : 245-54.

共引文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部