期刊文献+

论违约方申请合同解除中解除时间的确定——兼评《民法典合同编通则解释》第59条

On the Determination of the Rescission Time in the Application for Rescission of Contract by the Breaching Party
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最高人民法院在违约方申请合同解除中解除时间的规定上变化较大。整体而言,存在法院自由裁量说和确定日期说。从合同终止(解除)的功能目的、体系解释以及规则设计的内在逻辑看,确定日期说是能够实现效率、合乎规则体系以及任意性规则设计等更优的和理想的选择。自由裁量说虽然描述了法院的多数实际做法,但其原理内核仍然只能是确定日期说。这一分析能够为法院在违约方申请合同解除中解除时间点确定上的一般情况与例外情况提供更好的指引。 On the question of determining the termination date for the defaulting party to apply for the discharge of the contract,the view of the Supreme People's Court has changed greatly.Generally,there are the Specified Date Theory and the Courts'Discretionary Theory.From the perspective of the functional purpose of contract discharge(rescission),systematic interpretation,and the internal logic of rule design,the Specified Date Theory is a better and more ideal one for efficiency,compliance with the rule system,and default rule design.Although the Courts'Discretionary Theory presents most of the actual practice of the court,the core of its principle was still consistent with the Specified Date Theory.This analysis could provide better guidance for the court to determine the termination date when the breaching party applies for discharging of the contract.
作者 孙良国 SUN Liang'guo
出处 《法治研究》 北大核心 2024年第1期27-39,共13页 Research on Rule of Law
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“基于类型化的违约损害赔偿计算的公式化研究”(项目编号:22AFX014)阶段性成果。
关键词 违约方申请解除合同 解除时间 确定日期说 自由裁量说 discharge of contract by breaching party termination date specified date theory courts'discretionary theory
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献42

  • 1王轶.论买卖合同中债务履行不能风险的分配——以基于法律行为的物权变动模式的立法选择为考察背景[J].中外法学,1999,11(5):71-77. 被引量:7
  • 2新宇公司诉冯玉梅商铺买卖合同纠纷案[J].中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报,2006(6):37-42. 被引量:44
  • 3孙良国.效率违约理论研究[J].法制与社会发展,2006,12(5):102-109. 被引量:40
  • 4E. ALLAN FARNSWORTH, CONTRACTS (Fourth Edition) [M]. New York: ASPEN PUBLISHERS, 2004.
  • 5Andrew Burrows. Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract ( Third edition) [ M ]. London: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • 6Andrew S. Gold. A Property Theory of Contract [J]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2009, (Vol . 103, No. 1).
  • 7崔建远.合同法(第四版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.
  • 8Melvin A. Eisenberg. Actual and Virtual Specific Performance, the Theory of Efficient Breach, and the Indifference Principle in Contract Law [J] California Law Review, 2005, (Vol. 93, No. 4).
  • 9Charles L. Knapp, Nathan M. Crystal, Harry G. Prince. Problems in Contract Law: Case and Materials (6th. Edition) [ M]. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2007.
  • 10OLE LANDO AND HUGH BEALE (editor). PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW PARTS I AND II [ M]. Hague: KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, 2000.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部