减刑假释庭审实质化的时空重塑

The Reinvention of Time and Space in the Substantive Trial of Commutation and Parole Cases

减刑假释庭审实质化是刑事执行正义实现的重要环节,减刑假释庭审时空的错配极易导致庭审角色的混淆、证据审查的局限及审判公开的“空转”等问题。为避免“有名而无实”,应延循“实质化庭审”以解决“实质性争议”的思路,进一步精细化、类型化合理配置减刑假释庭审时空。以时空为路径对减刑假释庭审实质化的程序进行重塑,通过“听证”前置来发现实质性争议进而通过“诉讼”救济来促进实质性争议的解决,此外将监督权后置,发挥检察监督作用。

The substantive trial of commutation and parole cases is an important link to the realization of justice in criminal enforcement.The mismatch of time and space in the commutation and parole trial can easily lead to confusion in the role of the trial,the limitations of evidence review,and the“idle”of trial disclosure.In order to avoid falling into the formalism of“name but no substance”,the idea of“substantive court hearing”to resolve“substantive disputes”should be extended,and the time and space for commutation and parole trial should be further refined,typed and rationally allocated.The“hearing”is the first step to discover the substantive dispute and then to promote the resolution of the substantive dispute through“litigation”relief,in addition to postponing the supervision power and returning the prosecutorial supervision to the post-facto supervision.