现代公共文化服务体系建设政策创新扩散机理与启示

Policy Innovation and Diffusion Mechanism and Enlightenment of Modern Public Cultural Service System Construction

[目的/意义]量化研究公共文化服务政策创新扩散行为,探究其创新扩散机理,有助于为现代公共文化服务体系建设提供经验数据和科学依据。[方法/过程]本文基于政策创新扩散理论,以2005年以来党和国家的公共文化服务政策为研究对象,以代表性政策为研究案例,以强度、广度、速度与方向为分析维度,以行为现象、过程特征与形态模式为分析内容,探究公共文化服务政策创新扩散的机理。[结果/结论]研究发现:虽然中央强政策驱动了公共文化服务政策创新扩散,但抑制了地方公共文化服务政策的创新活力;公共文化服务政策创新扩散方向以平行扩散和向下扩散为主,表现出垂直型与“S”型模式;公共文化服务政策创新扩散行为体现了政策目标理念的迭代升级,推动了公共文化服务体系建设迈上“高质量、均衡化、现代化”新征程。据此,本文从政策引领示范、政策衔接优化及政策地方化创新实践3个方面提出启示。

[Purpose/significance]Quantitatively studying the innovation diffusion behavior of public cultural service policies and exploring its internal innovation diffusion mechanism is crucial for providing empirical data and a scientific foundation for the construction of a modern public cultural service system.[Method/process]Based on the theory of diffusion of policy innovation,this paper focuses on the public cultural service policies implemented by the Party and the state since 2005.Representative policies are examined as research cases,and various dimensions such as intensity,breadth,speed and direction are analyzed.The analysis also encompasses the behavioral phenomenon,process characteristics and morphological pattrens,aming to investigate the mechanism behind the innovation and diffusion of public cultural service policy.[Result/conclusion]The findings reveal that while the robust policies enforced by the central government drive the innovation and diffusion of public cultural service policies,they inadvertently hamper the innovation vigor of local public cultural service policies.The primary directions of innovation diffusion of public cultural service policies predominantly involve parallel diffusion and downward diffusion,characterized by both vertical and“S”patterns.The innovation and diffusion of public cultural service policies reflects the iterative upgrading of policy goals and concepts,and promotes the construction of public cultural service system to embark on a new journey of“high quality,balance and modernization”.Accordingly,this paper proposes insightful recommendations in three aspects:Policy-led demonstration,policy convergence optimization,and policy localization innovation practice.