期刊文献+

超声弹性成像在肝癌诊疗评估及预后预测中的研究进展

Research progress on the diagnosis,treatment evaluation and prognostic prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound elastography
原文传递
导出
摘要 超声弹性成像是一种非侵入性成像技术,可以测量肝组织硬度,为肝癌的诊断和治疗提供有价值的信息。超声弹性成像有无创、快速、安全、可重复性好等优势。本文就近年来超声弹性成像在肝癌诊断、治疗评估和预后预测中的应用研究进展进行综述,旨在帮助临床医生为患者制定更优治疗方案,改善患者预后,降低并发症。 Ultrasound elastography is a non-invasive imaging technique that can measure tissue hardness and provide valuable information for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.It offers numerous advantages,including non-invasiveness,rapidity,safety,excellent repeatability,cost-effectiveness,and high patient acceptance.This article reviews the current research progress of ultrasound elastography in diagnosis,treatment evaluation,and prognosis prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma,aiming to help clinicians to tailor treatment strategy,reduce complications,and improve prognosis.
作者 史斌 朱震宇 Shi Bin;Zhu Zhenyu(Department of Organ Transplantation,Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100039,China;Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Fifth Medical Center of Chinese the PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100071,China)
出处 《中华肝胆外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期69-72,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(92159305)。
关键词 弹性成像技术 肝肿瘤 疗效评估 预后预测 Elasticity imaging techniques Liver neoplasms Treatment evaluation Prognosis prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, et al. Seven hundred forty- seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection[J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2000, 191 (1) : 38- 46.
  • 2Castera L, Forms X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography [J ]. J Hepatol, 2008, 48 (5) :835-847.
  • 3Rahbafi NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure : a definition and grading by the international study group of liver surgery(ISGLS) [J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(5) : 713-724.
  • 4Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a surgery [J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240 (2) : 205-213.
  • 5Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al. Improvement in periope- rative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecu- tive cases over the past decade [J]. Ann Surg, 2002, 236(4) : 397-407.
  • 6Wei AC, Tung-Ping-Pooh R, Fan ST, et al. Risk factors for peri- operative morbidity and mortality after extended hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90( 1 ) : 33-41.
  • 7Bennett JJ, Blumgart LH. Assessment of hepatic reserve prior to hepatic resection[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2005, 12 (1) : 10-15.
  • 8Lee WC, Chen MF. Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection: how I do it [ J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2005, 12( 1 ) : 23-26.
  • 9Schindl M J, Redhead DN, Fearon KC, et al. The value of residu- al liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection [J]. Gut, 2005, 54 (2) : 289-296.
  • 10Truant S, Oberlin O, Sergent G, et al. Remnant liver volume to body weight ratio > or =0.5% : A new cut-off to estimate posto- perative risks after extended resection in noncirrhotic liver [ J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 204( 1 ) : 22-33.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部