期刊文献+

论塔斯基语义真理论的哲学影响——纪念《形式化语言中的真概念》出版90周年 被引量:1

On the Philosophical Implications of Tarski’s Semantic Theory of Truth:For The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages at Ninety
原文传递
导出
摘要 在《形式化语言中的真概念》中,塔斯基首次表述了其语义真理论。塔斯基语义真理论对二十世纪中后期的哲学和逻辑产生了深远的影响。不过,关于塔斯基语义真理论的哲学方面一直存在争议。值此出版90周年之际,通过揭示理论定位、突出哲学贡献与回应哲学争议来反思塔斯基语义真理论的哲学影响。理论定位方面,塔斯基语义真理论既是形式理论,也是哲学学说;哲学贡献方面,塔斯基语义真理论推动了“语义学革命”,开启了“塔斯基转向”;哲学争议方面,塔斯基语义真理论不是哲学上贫乏的,而是哲学上合理的。随着围绕“真”的研究的不断深入,塔斯基语义真理论的哲学影响会日益凸显。 In The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,Tarski first proposed the semantic theory of truth.Tarski’s semantic theory of truth had a profound impact on philosophy and logic in the mid-to-late twentieth century.However,the philosophical aspects of Tarski’s semantic theory of truth have been controversial.For the ninetieth anniversary edition of The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,by revealing the theoretical positioning,highlighting the philosophical contributions,and responding to the philosophical controversy,it helps us to further reflect on the philosophical implications of Tarski’s semantic theory of truth.In terms of theoretical positioning,Tarski’s semantic theory of truth is both a formal theory and a philosophical doctrine;In terms of philosophical contributions,Tarski’s semantic theory of truth promoted the“Semantic Revolution”and opened the“Tarskian Turn”;In terms of philosophical controversy,Tarski’s semantic theory of truth is not philosophically sterile,but philosophically sound.With the deepening of researches around“truth”,the philosophical implications of Tarski’s semantic theory of truth will become increasingly prominent.
作者 韦雷雷 孙萌萌 WEI Lei-lei;SUN Meng-meng(School of Marxism,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 北大核心 2023年第12期80-88,共9页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费项目“逻辑学视域下高校思政课教学研究”(202113019) 青岛市社会科学规划项目“高校逻辑教育助力青岛现代化建设研究”(QDSKL2301033)。
关键词 塔斯基 语义真理论 哲学 Tarski the semantic theory of truth truth philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献19

  • 1Halbach V. Axiomatic Theories of Truth[ M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  • 2Davidson D. Truth and Meaning[ C l//Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1984.
  • 3Fujimoto K. Classes and Truths in Set Theory[ J]. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 2012(163) : 1484 - 1523.
  • 4Horsten L. The Tarskian Turn: Deflationism and Axiomatic Truth[ M]. Cambridge .MIT Press, 2011.
  • 5Lachlan A. Full Satisfaction Classes and Recursive Saturation [ J ]. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 1981 (24) : 295 -297.
  • 6Kotlarski H, Krajewski S, Lachlan A. Construction of Satisfaction Classes for Non -Standard Models[ J ]. Canadian Mathe- matical Bulletin, 1981( 24):283-293.
  • 7Halbach V. Conservative Theories of Classical Truth [ J ]. Studia Logica, 1999 (62) :353 - 370.
  • 8Fischer M. Minimal Truth and Interpretability [ J ]. Review of Symbolic Logic, 2009 (2) :799 - 815.
  • 9Takeuti G. Proof Theory[ M]. Amsterdam :North - Holland , 2nd edition, 1987.
  • 10Feferman S. Reflecting on Incompleteness [ J ]. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1991 (56) : 1 -49.

共引文献1

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部