期刊文献+

治理的逻辑:比较的观点

The Logic of Governance:A Comparative Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方国家的治理和中国的治理在国家社会市场关系上呈现了一种相反的运动———西方的治理是从三者边界的清晰走向模糊,这一走向既是治理产生的原因,也是治理产生的结果;而中国的治理是在三者边界的模糊走向清晰的过程中发生的。这使得中国的治理带有了自身的一些特点。中国式的治理是否也要先完成一个从三者边界的模糊走向清晰再走向模糊(因为治理通常被认为是三者边界模糊的产物)这样一个过程?抑或在现有的格局下,通过什么样的方式也可以达到治理的效果?这些问题正是本文想探讨的。 The governance of western countries and that of China show opposite trends in the relationship among state,society and market.Concerning their relationship,the governance of western countries has experienced a change from clear boundaries to ambiguity,which is both the cause and result of governance.However,China’s governance is just the opposite,changing ambiguity to clear boundaries.This gives China’s governance certain distinct characteristics.Does the Chinese-style governance also need to undergo a similar process to clarity,then back to ambiguity as observed in western countries(as governance is usually considered as the product of ambiguity in the three boundaries)?Or in the existing climate,through what way can the effect of governance be achieved as well?These questions are what this paper attempts to discuss.
作者 竺乾威 ZHU Qianwei(School of International Relations and Public Affairs,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《岳麓公共治理》 2023年第1期1-13,共13页 YUELU PUBLIC GOVERNANCE
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“新时代特大城市管理创新机制研究”(项目编号:20JZD030)。
关键词 治理 国家社会市场关系 政府边界 governance relationship among state,society and market government boundaries
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1万江红,张翠娥.近十年我国民间组织研究综述[J].江汉论坛,2004(8):123-125. 被引量:16
  • 2罗宏杰.管理的制度化与制度化管理[J].科技信息,2007(5):111-111. 被引量:1
  • 3马克斯·韦伯.经济与社会(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998版.39页.
  • 4Gladden, E. N. A History of Public Administration [ M]. London. Frank Cass, 1972.
  • 5Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds).From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology [ M ] . London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
  • 6Kamenka, Eugene. Bureaucracy[M]. Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1989.
  • 7Behn, Robert D. The New Public Management Paradigm and the Search for Democratic Accountability[J ].International Public Management Journal, 1998, (1,2) :131- 164.
  • 8Behn, Robert D. Rethinking Democratic Accountability [ M ]. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
  • 9Ostrom, Vincent. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration [ M]. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1989.
  • 10Savas, E. S. Privatization : The Key to Better Government [M]. Chatham, NJ. Chatham House, 1987.

共引文献877

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部