期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死患者两种血清因子水平及临床意义

Serum levels of SOX6 and PTEN and their clinical significance in patients with acute myocardial infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Y染色体性别决定区相关高迁移率组盒蛋白6(SOX6)、第10号染色体缺失的磷酸酶及张力蛋白同源基因(PTEN)在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者血清中的表达及临床意义。方法选取2021年1月至2022年3月淄博市第一医院和淄博市中心医院收治的AMI患者100例为研究组,根据主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生情况将患者分为MACE组52例和非MACE组48例,选取同期于淄博市第一医院和淄博市中心医院进行健康体检的志愿者110例为对照组。检测血清PTEN和SOX6水平,用Pearson相关性分析AMI患者血清PTEN和SOX6与临床指标的相关性,用ROC曲线分析PTEN和SOX6水平对AMI及预后的诊断价值。结果与对照组比较,研究组血清SOX6 mRNA水平显著降低(0.69±0.14 vs 1.03±0.16,P<0.01),血清PTEN mRNA水平显著升高(1.56±0.15 vs 1.05±0.08,P<0.01)。与非MACE组比较,MACE组血清SOX6 mRNA水平显著降低(0.61±0.15 vs 0.78±0.13,P<0.01),血清PTEN mRNA水平显著升高(1.74±0.18 vs 1.37±0.12,P<0.01)。Pearson相关性分析显示,AMI患者血清PTEN水平与cTnI、CK-MB、Gensini评分呈正相关,血清SOX6水平与cTnI、CK-MB、Gensini评分呈负相关(P<0.01)。ROC曲线分析显示,血清SOX6和PTEN联合诊断AMI的曲线下面积为0.932(95%CI:0.889~0.962),二者联合预测AMI患者发生MACE的曲线下面积为0.933(95%CI:0.866~0.974)。结论AMI患者血清中SOX6水平下调,PTEN水平上调,二者联合检测有助于诊断AMI及预测MACE。 Objective To investigate the expression and clinical significance of SRY-box transcription factor 6(SOX6)and protein tyrosine phosphatase gene(PTEN)in patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI).Methods A total of 100 AMI patients admitted to Zibo First Hospital and Zibo Central Hospital from January 2021 to March 2022 were enrolled as the study group,and according to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE),they were grouped into MACE subgroup(52 cases)and non-MACE subgroup(48 cases).Another 110 volunteers who taking physical examination in above 2 hospitals during the same period were subjected as the control group.The levels of PTEN and SOX6 in the serum were detected,and Pearson correlation analysis was performed to investigate the correlation of serum PTEN and SOX6 levels with clinical indicators.ROC curve was drawn to assess the diagnostic value of PTEN and SOX6 levels for diagnosis and prognosis of AMI.Results The study group had significantly decreased serum mRNA level of SOX6(0.69±0.14 vs 1.03±0.16,P<0.01)and increased serum mRNA level of PTEN(1.56±0.15 vs 1.05±0.08,P<0.01)than the control group.Similar results were seen in the MACE subgroup than the non-MACE subgroup(SOX6:0.61±0.15 vs 0.78±0.13,P<0.01;PTEN:1.74±0.18 vs 1.37±0.12,P<0.01).Pearson correlation analysis showed that the serum level of PTEN was positively,and that of SOX6 was negatively correlated with cTnI,CK-MB and Gensini score(P<0.01).ROC curve analysis indicated that the AUC value of combined serum SOX6 and PTEN levels for diagnosis of AMI was 0.932(95%CI:0.889-0.962),and that for predicting MACE was 0.933(95%CI:0.866-0.974).Conclusion The serum level of SOX6 is down-regulated,and that of PTEN was up-regulated in AMI patients.Their combined detection is helpful for diagnosis of AMI and prediction of MACE.
作者 张莹 赵锦彤 于天平 燕涛 潘平 Zhang Ying;Zhao Jintong;Yu Tianping;Yan Tao;Pan Ping(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Zibo First Hospital,Zibo 255000,Shandong Province,China)
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第1期38-41,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 心肌梗死 SOXD转录因子类 诊断 人类第10号染色体缺失的编码与磷酸酶和张力蛋白同源的基因 myocardial infarction SOXD transcription factors diagnosis phosphatase and tensin homologue deletedon chromosome 10
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 4Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMoa0904327.

共引文献584

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部