期刊文献+

商业综合体城市阅读空间可及性研究

Research on the Accessibility of Urban Reading Space in Commercial Complex
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商业综合体城市阅读空间作为图书馆的延伸,因其地理位置便利、氛围亲切、服务多样而具备高可及性和吸引力。研究以上海两种典型开发运营模式下五例商业综合体城市阅读空间为对象,运用可及性理论进行定性分析,探究其可及性影响因素及提升策略。结果显示,使用者青睐交通便捷、功能简单、运营稳定的阅读空间。企业主导模式应优化整体运营策略,提升可持续性;政府主导模式应注重选址与公共交通系统的联系;两者可通过加强跨部门合作,提升服务品质与可持续性。 As an extension of library,urban reading space in commercial complex has the advantages of easy access,strong affinity,and diverse services.Based on the access theory,this study investigates the access of urban reading spaces in five different commercial complexes under two typical development and management modes in Shanghai,and qualitatively analyzes the influencing factors and improvement strategies for the access of reading spaces.The results show that users prefer reading spaces that are easy to reach,simple in function,and continuously operational.The enterprise-led model should optimize the operational strategy to enhance sustainability.The government-led model should focus on the connection between location selection and public transportation system.Both models could enhance service quality and sustainability by strengthening cross departmental cooperation.
作者 蒋妤婷 王桢栋 陈有菲 曹中源 JIANG Yuting;WANG Zhendong;CHEN Youfei;CAO Zhongyuan
出处 《新建筑》 2024年第1期110-113,共4页 New Architecture
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(21BGL028) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(22120210239) 同济大学理论创新课题。
关键词 可及性 商业综合体 公共文化服务 公私合作 城市阅读空间 accessibility commercial complex public cultural services public-private partnership urban reading space
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献101

  • 1蔡卫平.我国公共图书馆合理布局的基本原则[J].图书馆,2007(2):17-21. 被引量:11
  • 2[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克.国际人权制度导论[M].柳华文,译.北京大学出版社,2010:61.
  • 3Andersen. R, Kravits. J and Anderson. OW. The Public's View of the Crisis in Medical Care: An Impetus for Changing Delivery Systems? [J]. Economic and Business Bulletin, 1971(24):44.
  • 4Andersen. R. Behavioral Model of Families Use of Heahh Services[R]. Chicago: Center for Health Administration Studies, U- niversity of Chicago, 1968.
  • 5Aday. LA, Andersen R, et al. Health Care in the U.S.:Equitable for Whom? [M]. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications, 1980:7,12-13.
  • 6Pechansky. R, Thomas. W. The Concept of Access: Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction [J]. Medical Care,1981 (2) :127-140.
  • 7David. P, Anu. G, Gerry. B. Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries [J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008,11(36):161-171.
  • 8Katarina Tomasevski. Preliminary Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education[EB/OL].199912014-10-21]. http:// daceess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G99/101/34/PDF/G9910134.pdf?. OpenElement.
  • 9Katarina Tomasevski. Progress Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education [EB/OL].2000 [2014-10-21]. http:// daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/GOO/ l O4/58/PDF/GOO10458.pdf?. OpenElement.
  • 10Katarina Tomasevski. Manual on Rights-based Education: Global Human Rights Requirements Made Simple [R].Bangkok: UN- ESCO Bangkok, 2004:7-9.

共引文献341

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部