期刊文献+

基于因果链的国家自然科学基金长周期影响评估逻辑框架构建研究

Research on the logic framework construction of long term impact assessment of National Natural Science Foundation of China based on causal chain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对国家自然科学基金探索开展长周期、学术性与社会影响的全面系统的影响评估,有助于全面总结基金资助的广泛经济社会影响,并提出更为有效的资助方式。本文基于变革理论和因果链分析,首先清晰界定了基础研究计划影响和影响评估的概念;然后从变革的发展阶段综合考虑科学基金的学术与社会影响,构建出“科研产出、科研影响、科研环境”的多维影响评估逻辑,由此设计了国家自然科学基金影响评估的逻辑框架;进一步以国家自然科学基金的一个资助计划为典型案例,从该计划的定位、目标、成效出发,依据影响评估的逻辑框架设计出具体评估内容,并提出了开展基础研究计划影响评估的政策建议。 Since the 18th Party Congress,the Party Central Committee has attached great importance to strengthening basic research.In this context,basic research,as the source and general switch of scientific and technological innovation,is an important kernel for promoting China s scientific and technological progress.As China s investment in basic research continues to grow substantially,the government,as an investor,needs to understand whether the utility and value of its investment in basic research is maximized,as well as its impact and effect on scientific and technological development,social progress and economic growth.The National Natural Science Fund,as one of the important channels of funding for basic research in China,has grown rapidly over the past five years.In order to assess the financial support and management performance of the National Natural Science Fund,in 2011,the National Natural Science Fund Commission conducted an international evaluation of overall performance.Subsequently,the National Natural Science Fund began the annual performance evaluation,gradually evaluating the various types of projects.So far,18 project types have been fully covered.However,in view of the current state of research in China,the performance evaluation indicators of existing national natural science funds or the corresponding evaluation methods are focused on short and medium-term outputs and benefits,which are not consistent with the needs of long-term evaluations required for basic research programmes.Therefore,this paper makes a comprehensive and systematic assessment of the impact of the National Natural Science Fund on long-cycle,academic and non-academic research,which can help to comprehensively summarize the broad economic and social impact of the Fund and propose more effective ways of funding.Based on the theory of change and causal chain analysis,this paper firstly defines the concepts of impact and impact assessment of basic research programs,and divides the causal chain of the impact of basic research programs into six stages:inputs,activities,outputs,short-term changes,medium-term changes,and long-term changes.And then from the dimensions of the impact of the science fund,it constructs a multi-dimensional impact assessment of‘scientific research outputs,scientific research impacts,and scientific research environment’.Then from the dimensions of the impact of the science fund,a multi-dimensional impact assessment logical framework of‘scientific research output,scientific research impact,scientific research environment’is constructed,from which the index system of impact assessment of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC)is designed;further,taking the Yunnan Joint Fund as a typical case,and from the assessment needs of the program,the specific assessment index system of the Yunnan Joint Fund is designed based on the logical framework of the impact assessment,and the corresponding policy recommendations are put forward from the actual situation of impact assessment of the basic research program in China.It also puts forward corresponding policy suggestions from the practical point of view of conducting impact assessment of basic research programs in China.
作者 方勇 汪楚媛 苑怡 陈雪艳 FANG Yong;WANG Chuyuan;YUAN Yi;CHEN Xueyan(School of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Chemical Technology,Beijing 100029,China;National Center for Science&Technology Evaluation,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《科技管理学报》 2024年第1期1-11,共11页 Journal of Science and Technology Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(J2124014)。
关键词 基础研究计划 绩效评估 影响评估 变革理论 basic research plan performance evaluation impact assessment theory of change
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献214

共引文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部