期刊文献+

社会影响力评价:高校有组织科研评价的新方向 被引量:1

Social Impact Evaluation:A New Direction of Organized Research Evaluation in Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 相对于学术影响力评价而言,社会影响力评价的本质是以科研成果的创新质量与社会贡献为核心,对促进高校有组织科研的导向性、交叉性和协同性具有重要意义。构建基于社会影响力的科研评价体系应坚持社会逻辑的评价理念、强调评价内容的跨界整合、促进多元主体协同创新和指向评价方法的综合集成。社会影响力评价带来高校有组织科研评价理念引领度、社会贡献度、主体参与度、方法集成度等评价要素的多重创新。对此,高校有组织科研社会影响力评价应秉持系统科学思想,迈向复杂科学评价范式;立足质量创新导向,完善科研评价体制机制;引入循证科研评价,创新数据信息采集方法。 Compared to academic influence evaluation,the essence of social influence evaluation is centered on the innovative quality and social contribution of scientific research achievements,which is of great significance for promoting the orientation,intersection,and collaboration of organized scientific research in universities.The construction of a scientific research evaluation system based on social influence should adhere to the evaluation concept of social logic,emphasize the cross-border integration of evaluation content,promote collaborative innovation among multiple subjects,and comprehensively integrate evaluation methods.The evaluation of social influence brings multiple innovations to the evaluation elements of organized scientific research evaluation in universities,including the leading degree of the concept,social contribution,subject participation,and method integration.In this regard,the evaluation of the social influence of organized scientific research in universities should adhere to the systematic scientific thinking and move towards a complex scientific evaluation paradigm;based on the orientation of quality innovation,improve the scientific research evaluation system and mechanism;introducing evidence-based scientific research evaluation and innovating data and information collection methods.
作者 耿旭 欧阳光华 Geng Xu;Ouyang Guanghua
机构地区 华中师范大学
出处 《国家教育行政学院学报》 北大核心 2024年第2期40-48,59,共10页 Journal of National Academy of Education Administration
基金 全国教育科学规划2021年度一般项目“教学学术视域下美国高校教师教学评价研究”(BDA210080)。
关键词 社会影响力评价 有组织科研 科研评价 评价范式转型 Social impact evaluation Organized scientific research Scientific research evaluation Transformation of evaluation paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献239

共引文献304

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部