数字人文视域下的《潞河游记》与曹雪芹朋友圈——兼及“松斋”批语的文献价值

Travelogue of Lu River and Cao Xueqin’s Social Circle from the Perspective of Digital Humanities:With Reference to the Literature Value of the Song Zhai’s Criticism

新的数字环境有助于进一步复原曹雪芹的交游情况和生活世界,推进对以往红学疑案的认识。从地理活动范围、人际关系疏近、生活时间范围推算,敦诚《四松堂集》卷四《潞河游记》出现的“松斋白筠”并非在脂本上撰写评语的“松斋”。从《红楼梦》早期流传渠道看,墨香不可能通过松斋阅读到脂本系统的《红楼梦》。可见,即使是在相对较小的曹雪芹泛交游圈中,同名异人情况也是常见的。运用数字人文视角有助于提醒学者关注“例外”、通过可视化方法深化推演精度,并在数据充足的情况下进一步复原“曹雪芹的朋友圈”及“诸公”的小说评点过程。

The new digital environment can help further restore Cao Xueqin’s social life and worldview,and promote the understanding of previous doubtful cases in redology.From the geographical activity range,interpersonal relationship distance,and time range of life,it is estimated that“Song Zhai Bai Yun”in Travelogue of Lu River in Dun Chengs Sisongtangji is not“Song Zhai”who wrote comments on Dream of Red Mansions.In terms of the early circulation channels of Dream of Red Mansions,it is impossible for Moxiang to read Dream of Red Mansions through Song Zhai.It can be seen that even in the relatively small social circle of Cao Xueqin,people with the same name are not uncommon.The application of digital humanities can help scholars notice something exceptional,deepen the accuracy of reasoning through visual methods,and further restore the process of“Cao Xueqin’s social circle”and the scholars in novel criticism with sufficient data.