期刊文献+

审美自律与艺术自律——从审美的艺术运用看两者的关系

Aesthetic Autonomy and Art Autonomy——Analyzing from the Role of Aesthetic in Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “美”与“艺术”在古代虽时有交集,但仍是两条各自发展的路线,恰是近代建立起来的“审美”自觉意识,以“审美”而非“美”作为“美的艺术”的评判方式,方使“美的艺术”门类与“美的艺术”观念得以建立,也正是在“美的艺术”所明确的“审美”与“艺术”的包含关系中,“艺术”以基于自身特性的优势,向“审美”承诺了自律规则的展现条件,亦即证明了“艺术自律”的可能,鉴赏规则下的“审美自律”规定从此成为“艺术自律”的自觉要求,“审美自律”成为“艺术自律”的基础,“审美自律”向“艺术自律”的过渡取得合法性。 Although“beauty”and“art”sometimes overlapped in ancient times,they were still developing independently.It is the“aesthetic”consciousness established in modern times,which taking“aesthetic”rather than“beauty”as the way to judge “fine art”. So the category and the concept of “fine art” were estab-lished. It is in the inclusion relationship between “aesthetic” and “art”, art, based on its own characteristics, promises to “aesthetic” the conditions for the applica-tion of self-discipline rules, which also proves the possibility of “art autonomy”. Since then, “aesthetic” rules have become the conscious requirement of “art”, “Aesthetic autonomy” becomes the basis of “art autonomy”.
作者 许婷婷 刘旭光 Xu Tingting;Liu Xuguang(College of Liberal Arts,Shanghai University)
出处 《美学与艺术评论》 2023年第2期74-89,225,226,共18页 Journal of Aesthetics and Art Review
基金 国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“中国近代以来艺术中的审美理论话语研究”(批准号:20ZD28)阶段性成果。
关键词 美的艺术 审美 艺术自律 康德 Fine art aesthetic art autonomy Kant
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献50

  • 1Peter Btirger, Theory of the Avant-Garde, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984, pp. 35-54. pp. 47-49, p. 53.
  • 2Raymond Williams, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, New York : Oxford University Press, 1976,pp. 40 - 41.
  • 3Wladyslaw Tatarkiewicz, A History of Six Ideas, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980, p. 23.
  • 4“Origins of Aesthetics,”by Paul Oskar Kristeller,Encyclopedia of Aeshetics,1998.
  • 5“A utonomy:Historical Overview”,by Casey Haskins,Encyclopedia ofAesthetics,1998.
  • 6H. H. Herth & C. W. Mills, eds. , From Max Weber:Essays in Sociology, New York: Oxford University Press,1946, p. 341.
  • 7Pierre Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production, Cambridge: Polity, 1992, p. 115.
  • 8Quoted in Peter Burger, Theory of the Avant-Garde, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984, p. 24.
  • 9Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
  • 10Harold Perkin,The Rise of Professional Society,London:Routtedge,1989.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部