期刊文献+

颈动脉支架置入术后发生支架内再狭窄危险因素的Meta分析

Meta analysis of risk factors for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈动脉支架置入(CAS)术后发生支架内再狭窄(ISR)的危险因素。方法检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库,搜索CAS术后发生ISR危险因素的相关研究,检索时间为建库至2022年1月1日,采用Rev Man 5.4.1软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入22篇文献,包括3篇队列研究,19篇病例对照研究。Meta分析结果显示,糖尿病、吸烟、高血压、高脂血症、外周动脉疾病、闭环支架、残余狭窄均是CAS术后发生ISR的危险因素(P﹤0.05),症状性颈动脉狭窄、开环支架均是CAS术后发生ISR的保护因素(P﹤0.05)。结论医务人员可参照上述因素对接受CAS的患者进行排查,制定相应的干预措施,以期降低再狭窄的发生率。 Objective To investigate the risk factors of intrastent restenosis(ISR)after carotid stent implantation(CAS).Method PubMed,Embase,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library,CBM,CNKI,VIP and Wanfang database were electronically searched to collect the studies about the risk factors for ISR after CAS from database inception to January 1,2022.Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5.4.1 software.Result A total of 22 articles were collected.The Meta-analysis results showed that diabetes,smoking,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,peripheral artery disease,closed-cell stents,and residual stenosis were risk factors for ISR after CAS,symptomatic carotid stenosis and open-cell stents were protective factors for ISR after CAS.Conclusion Healthcare professionals can refer to the above factors to screen patients undergoing CAS,and formulate corresponding intervention measures,to reduce the occurrence of in-stent restenosis.
作者 马丹风 孙岩 Ma Danfeng;Sun Yan(Department of Vascular Surgery,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University,Ji'nan 250021,Shandong,China)
出处 《血管与腔内血管外科杂志》 2024年第1期27-32,共6页 Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
基金 山东省中医药科技发展计划(2019-0303) 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(2018WS273)。
关键词 支架内再狭窄 颈动脉支架置入术 危险因素 META分析 in-stent restenosis carotid artery stenting risk factor Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献138

  • 1沈俐萍.颈动脉内膜剥脱术与颈动脉支架成形术治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄的效果比较[J].华夏医学,2021(1):145-148. 被引量:5
  • 2华扬,刘蓓蓓,凌晨,段春,刘强,缪中荣,李慎茂,凌锋.超声检查对颈动脉狭窄50%~69%和70%~99%诊断准确性的评估[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2006,3(5):211-218. 被引量:117
  • 3各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33022
  • 4周波,竺挺,符伟国,颜志平.颈动脉支架内再狭窄的早期随访结果分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(6):662-664. 被引量:8
  • 5Massop D, Dave R, Metzger C, et al. for SAPPHIRE World- wide Investigators. Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high-risk for endarterectomy: SAPPHIRE Worldwide Registry first 2,001 patients[ J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2009,73 (2) : 129-136.
  • 6Groschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB, et al. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting [ J ]. Stroke, 2005,36 ( 2 ) : 367-373.
  • 7Chahwan S, Miller MT, Pigott JP, et al. Carotid artery velocity characteristics after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting [J]. J Vasc Surg,2007,45 (3) :523-526.
  • 8Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, Boules TN, et al. Determining in-stent stenosis of carotid arteries by duplex ultrasound criteria [ J ]. J Endovasc Ther,2005,12 ( 3 ) :346-353.
  • 9Chi YW, White CJ, Woods TC, et al. Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis [ J ]. Catheter Cardio- vasc Interv, 2007,69 ( 3 ) : 349-354.
  • 10Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis:gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis --Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus conference [ J ]. Radiology,2003,229(2) :340-346.

共引文献1453

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部