思维导图与传统PPT在骨科实习生中的教学效果比较

A Comparative Study of the Teaching Effectiveness of Mind Maps and Traditional PPT Methods in Orthopedic Interns

目的:比较应用思维导图和传统PPT在骨科实习生中的教学效果。方法:选取2016级在我院实习的临床医学专业3班的学生为受试对象,随机分为试验组(25名)和对照组(26名)。试验组采用思维导图教学法,对照组采用传统PPT课件教学,授课教师、授课内容、授课学时相同。实习结束后对学生进行理论和技能考试,并对每位学生发放临床思维能力评估量表。结果:试验组和对照组学生的理论考试成绩分别为(91.92±5.47)分、(85.69±6.55)分,技能考试成绩分别为(89.56±4.18)分、(84.38±4.47)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组和对照组学生的临床思维能力评分分别为(91.84±3.69)分、(76.46±3.68)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:思维导图教学法的效果优于传统PPT教学法,更有助于医学生临床思维能力的提高。

Objective:To compare the teaching effectiveness of mind maps and traditional PPT methods in orthopedic interns.Methods:The clinical medical students from the 2016 class in our hospital were randomly divided into the experimental group(25 students)and the control group(26 students).The experimental group received mind maps teaching,while the control group received traditional PPT teaching.The instructors,content,and hours of instruction were the same for both groups.After the completion of the internship,the students underwent theoretical and practical exams,and each student was given a clinical thinking ability assessment form.Results:The experimental group's scores in theoretical and practical exams were(91.92±5.47)and(89.56±4.18)points,respectively,significantly higher than the control group's scores of(85.69±6.55)and(84.38±4.47)points(P<0.05).The clinical thinking ability scores of the experimental group were(91.84±3.69),significantly higher than the control group's score of(76.46±3.68)(P<0.05).Conclusion:The teaching effectiveness of mind maps is superior to traditional PPT methods in orthopedic intern education,particularly in enhancing clinical thinkingabilities.