摘要
实证法侧重无人机的安全规范问题,并未就无人机拍摄负载侵权作出特别规定,这就决定了私主体仅能依循传统民法路径维护自身权益。然而,传统的救济路径并不足以应对该类权益侵害问题。基于此,文章认为应通过体系解释与目的解释等方法构建完善周延的规范体系。除人格权规范之外,《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》(简称《个人信息保护法》)第二十六条为规范图像采集设备的使用提供了制度基础,应充分发挥其效用以规制当前无人机拍摄负载的滥用现象。同时也应注意到《个人信息保护法》的制度设计僵硬问题,宜充分发挥划界条款和个人信息合理使用制度的功能,构建缓冲带以免对各方主体造成侵害。
Empirical law focuses on the safety regulations of drones and does not stipulate provisions on the infringement of drone shooting payload,which determines that private entities can only rely on traditional civil law to protect their own rights and interests.Nevertheless,traditional remedies are not sufficient to address such infringement issues.To this end,the article argues that a comprehensive regulatory system should be constructed through system interpretation and purpose interpretation.In addition to personality rights,Article 26 of the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC provides an institutional basis for regulating the use of image capture devices,and it should be put into effect to regulate the current misuse of drone shooting payload.At the same time,the rigidity of the institutional design of the Personal Information Protection Law should be noted.It is advisable to fully leverage the roles of boundary clauses and the system of fair use of personal information,so as to build a buffer zone to avoid infringement on all parties involved.
作者
郭宏璟
Guo Hongjing(Law School of Hainan University,Haikou 570228)
出处
《中阿科技论坛(中英文)》
2024年第3期168-172,共5页
China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum
基金
河南省法学会民法学研究课题项目“私法领域‘动态系统论’的适用研究”[HNCLS(2023)56]。
关键词
拍摄负载
隐私权
个人信息保护
合理使用
Image payload
Privacy rights
Personal information protection
Fair use