期刊文献+

血管内超声测定定量血流分数对临界病变冠状动脉介入手术策略的价值

The value of quantitative flow ratio determined by intravascular ultrasound for critical lesions coronary intervention strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的结合血管内超声结果分析定量血流分数在评估冠状动脉中重度狭窄及介入手术策略的指导价值。方法回顾性收集2022年2—10月在北京安贞医院住院行冠状动脉造影(CA)和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)并接受靶血管血管内超声检查(IVUS)的患者110例,基于IVUS结果定量测定靶血管最小管腔面积(MLA)和斑块负荷(PB)等参数。利用患者的冠状动脉造影图像数据,对接受治疗的靶病变血管计算定量血流分数(QFR)。以IVUS结果为依据,评价QFR对血管病变程度的诊断及对行介入手术策略的价值。结果筛选临界病变并行IVUS检查110例,其中IVUS图像伪影严重13例,血管严重迂曲18例,造影显示全程病变或图像质量不佳24例,最终共计入组患者55例、靶血管55支。以IVUS管腔面积≤3 mm^(2)或IVUS管腔面积≤4 mm^(2)并且IVUS斑块负荷≥70%,作为血管显著狭窄引起心肌缺血的诊断标准。患者QFR值为0.75±0.12,MLA为(3.32±0.74)mm^(2),PB为(70±9)%。QFR值≤0.800时与IVUS评价冠状动脉狭窄缺血的一致性良好(Kappa=0.656,P<0.01,95%CI 0.452~0.860)。QFR的敏感度为0.853,特异度为0.810,阳性预测值为87.9%,阴性预测值为77.3%;MLA和QFR值之间存在中度正相关关系(r=0.566,P<0.01)。PB和QFR值之间存在轻度负相关关系(r=-0.371,P<0.01)。结论QFR对冠脉临界病变狭窄治疗决策的指导具有良好的诊断意义。 Objective To analyze the value of quantitative flow ratio in the evaluation of moderate-to-severe coronary artery stenosis and the interventional strategy in conjunction with the results of intravascular ultrasound.Methods A total of 55 patients admitted to Beijing Anzhen Hospital for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention and intravascular ultrasound guidance were retrospectively collected.The minimum lumen area(MLA)and plaque burden(PB)measured by intravascular ultrasound were collected.The data of coronary angiography were used to calculate the quantitative flow Ratio of the treated target vessels.Based on intravascular ultrasound,to evaluate the value of quantitative flow ratio in the diagnosis of vascular disease and the guidance of interventional surgery strategy.Results 110 cases of critical lesions were screened and examined by IVUS,of which 13 cases had serious artifacts in IVUS images,18 cases had serious tortuous vessels,and 24 cases had full lesions or poor image quality,and 55 patients and 55 target vessels were enrolled in the final study.The diagnostic criteria for myocardial ischemia due to significant stenosis were IVUS lumen area≤3 mm^(2) or IVUS lumen area≤4 mm^(2) and IVUS plaque load≥70%.The QFR value of 0.75±0.12,MLA(3.32±0.74)mm^(2),and PB(70±9)%.QFR values≤0.80 were in good agreement with IVUS for evaluating coronary artery stenosis ischemia(Kappa=0.656,P<0.01,95%CI 0.452-0.860).The sensitivity of QFR was 0.853,specificity was 0.810,positive predictive value was 87.9%,negative predictive value was 77.3%;there was a moderate positive correlation between MLA and QFR values(r=0.566,P<0.01).There was a slight negative correlation between PB and QFR values(r=-0.371,P<0.01).Conclusions QFR has good diagnostic significance in guiding the treatment decision of coronary critical lesion stenosis.
作者 李军 马晓海 邱威 Li Jun;Ma Xiaohai;Qiu Wei(Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment Department,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2024年第3期278-281,286,共5页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
关键词 定量血流分数 血管内超声 冠状动脉造影 血流储备分数 心肌缺血 Quantitative flow ratio Intravascular ultrasound Coronary angiography Flow reserve fraction Myocardial ischemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献68

  • 1Bech G J,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis:a randomized trial[J].CIRCULATION,2001.2928-2934.
  • 2Pijls NH,van Schaardenburgh P,Manoharan G. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis:5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study[J].Journal of the America College of Cardiology,2007.2105-2111.
  • 3De Bruyne B,Pijls NH,Kalesan B. Fractional flow reserve guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2012.991-1001.
  • 4Tonino PA,De Bruyne B,Pijls NH. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2009.213-224.
  • 5Hemández Garcia MJ,Alonso-Briales JH,Jiménez-Navarro M. Clinical management of patients with coronary syndromes and negative fractional flow reserve findings[J].Journal of Interventional Cardiology,2001.505-509.
  • 6Fischer J J,Wang XQ,Samady H. Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate coronary lesions undcrgoing dcfcrral of rcvascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment[J].Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions,2006.544-548.
  • 7Esen AM,Acar G,Esen O. The prognostic value of combined fractional flow reserve and TIMI frame count measurements in patients with stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndrome[J].Journal of Interventional Cardiology,2010.421-428.
  • 8Miller LH,Toklu B,Rauch J. Very long-term clinical followup after fractional flow reserve-guided coronary revascularization[J].Journal of Invasive Cardiology,2012.309-315.
  • 9Lansky A J,Goto K,Cristea E. Clinical and angiographic predictors of short-and long-term ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes:results from the acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy (ACUITY) trial[J].Circ Cardiovasc Interv,2010.308-316.
  • 10Sels JW,Tonino PA,Siebert U. Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study[J].JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2011.1183-1189.

共引文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部