期刊文献+

基于实施科学理论和框架的北京市校园流感疫苗接种项目质量改进策略构建及其评估 被引量:1

Development and evaluation of multifaceted strategies for the school-located influenza vaccination program in Beijing using implementation science theories and frameworks
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建和评估优化北京市校园流感疫苗接种(School-located influenza vaccination,SLIV)项目的实施策略。方法在北京市选择利益相关者开展定性访谈,基于实施性研究综合框架(Consolidated framework for implementation research,CFIR)分析SLIV项目学龄儿童接种流感疫苗(Influenza vaccine,InfV)的阻碍因素,应用CFIR-实施变革专家建议实施策略匹配工具构建质量改进策略。基于RE-AIM框架和常态化过程理论制订质量改进策略的评估指标,在北京市20所小学采用整群随机试验开展评估。结果学龄儿童接种InfV的阻碍因素包括工作规划不足、跨部门协作困难、学校工作人员知识和信息可及性不足、家长认识误区等。构建的多层次质量改进策略包括促进规划与协调、培训主管校长和校医、开展学龄儿童及其家长健康教育和提醒。多层次质量改进策略在RE-AIM的5个维度均呈积极效应,干预组和对照组学龄儿童在学校或其他场所的InfV接种率分别为75.96%(695/915)、71.26%(553/776)[调整OR(95%CI):1.49(1.12-1.99)]。73.33%的校医、87.18%的班主任和70.38%的家长愿意继续开展多层次质量改进策略。结论基于实施科学理论和框架构建的实施策略有助于促进SLIV项目实施和可持续性,提高学龄儿童流感疫苗接种率。 Objective To develop and evaluate implementation strategies for improving the school-located influenza vaccination(SLIV)program in Beijing.Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with selected stakeholders to identify barriers against influenza vaccine(InfV)vaccination of school-aged children in the SLIV program using the consolidated framework for implementation research(CFIR).We developed quality improvement strategies using the implementation strategies matching tool of CFIR-expert recommendations for implementing change(ERIC),generated evaluation indicators for the strategies using the reach effectiveness adoption implementation maintenance(RE-AIM)framework and the normalization process theory,and conducted a cluster-randomized evaluation trial in 20 primary schools of Beijing.Results Barriers for InfV vaccination included lack of work planning,difficulties in interdepartmental collaboration,inadequate access to knowledge and information for school implementers,and parental misconceptions.Multifaceted quality improvement strategies included promoting work planning and coordination,training headmasters and school doctors,and educating and reminding students and parents.The strategies showed positive effects in the five dimensions of the RE-AIM framework;InfV coverage was 75.96%(695/915)in the intervention group compared with 71.26%(553/776)in the control group[adjusted OR(95%CI):1.49(1.12-1.99)];73.33% of school doctors,87.18% of head teachers,and 70.38% of parents were willing to continue the multifaceted quality improvement strategies.Conclusions Implementation strategies,developed based on implementation science theories and frameworks,may facilitate implementation and sustainability of the SLIV program and increase InfV coverage among primary school students.
作者 胡奕娈 闫睿杰 尹学珺 宫恩莹 辛欣 石晓燕 汪静 孙昊 张娟 Hu Yiluan;YanRujie;Yin Xuejun;Gong Enying;Xin Xin;Shi Xiaoyan;Wang Jing;Sun Hao;Zhang Juan(School of Population Medicine and Public Health,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China;George Institute for Global Health,University of New South Wales,New South Wales 2052,Australia;Faculty of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;Dongcheng Primary and Secondary School Health Care Center,Beijing 100010,China;Dongcheng Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 100013,China)
出处 《中国疫苗和免疫》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第1期54-60,共7页 Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
基金 美国中华医学基金会OC2项目(20-379)。
关键词 流感疫苗 预防接种 实施科学 实施策略 实施性研究综合框架 RE-AIM框架 Influenzavaccine Vaccination Implementation science Implementation strategy Consolidated framework for implementation research(CFIR) Reacheffectiveness adoption implementation maintenance(RE-AIM)framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献114

  • 1田文华.基于RE-AIM模型的城乡居民大病保险模式评估[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2021,63(1):152-160. 被引量:7
  • 2吴疆,董振英,丁丽新,刘海林.1999-2004年北京市流感疫苗接种情况分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2005,16(4):19-21. 被引量:41
  • 3Blackwood B.Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions.J Adv Nurs,2006,54 (5):612-622.
  • 4MRC.A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health,2000.
  • 5Craig P,Dieppe P,Macintyre S,et al.Developing and evaluating complex interventions:the new medical research council guidance.BMJ,2008,337:a1655.
  • 6Anderson R.New MRC guidance on evaluating complex interventions.BMJ,2008,337:a 1937.
  • 7Hardeman W,Sutton S,Griffin S,et al.A causal modelling approach to the development of theory-based behaviour change programmes for trial evaluation.Health Educ Res,2005,20(6):676-687.
  • 8Williams K,Prevost AT,Griffin S,et al.The proactive trial protocol-a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a family-based,domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity among individuals at high risk of diabetes[ISRCTN61323766] .BMC Public Health,2004,4:48.
  • 9Rudolf M,Christie D,Mcelhone S,et al.WATCH IT:a community based programme for obese children and adolescents.Arch Dis Child,2006,91 (9):736-739.
  • 10Freemantle N,Nazareth I,Eccles M,et al.A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice.Br J Gen Pract,2002,52 (477):290-295.

共引文献137

同被引文献20

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部