合规的刑事政策起源论之否定——以中美刑事政策差异为切入

Criticism of the Viewpoint that"Compliance Originates from Criminal Policy"

合规学者绕开刑法罪刑法定原则的限制,借助灵活的刑事政策搭建合规的理论基底,将宽严相济解读为轻轻重重,并将轻轻重重解读为合规的前提,主张刑事政策是合规的泉源。这不仅是对中美刑事政策的误解,也是对合规起源的误读。我国的宽严相济刑事政策与美国的轻轻重重刑事政策在社会背景和内在逻辑上差异显著,轻轻重重刑事政策也并非是合规的理论起点,故采用曲解宽严相济刑事政策和重刑主义的路径并不能论证起源论的合理性,合规并不起源于刑事政策。

Compliance scholars bypass the limitations of the principle of legality in criminal law and use flexible criminal policies to build a theoretical basis for compliance.However,the path of misinterpreting the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity and the principle of severe punishment does not fully demonstrate the correlation between compliance and crimi-nal policy.Interpreting the combination of leniency and severity as mild and severe,and interpre-ting mild and severe as a prerequisite for compliance,are both misunderstandings of China US criminal policies.There are significant differences in social background and internal logic be-tween China's leniency and severity criminal policy and the United States'leniency and severity criminal policy.The compliance theory itself cannot match the leniency and severity criminal policy,so compliance and criminal policy are not relevant.