期刊文献+

不同鸡马立克病疫苗的免疫保护效果比较

Comparative Evaluation of Immunological Protective Efficacy Among Various Marek’s Disease Vaccines in Chickens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】对国内外共7个批次/品种(A~D,F~H)的CVI988或CVI988+HVT商品疫苗进行免疫保护分析,以期了解不同马立克病(MD)疫苗的保护效果,为该病的防控提供参考。【方法】将140只1日龄SPF鸡随机分为9组,G01~G09组,其中G01~G07组(15只/组)分别按推荐剂量免疫A~D及F~H马立克病疫苗,G08(攻毒对照组,15只)和G09(空白对照组,20只)组不免疫,7日龄时G01~G08组分别经腹腔注射马立克病病毒(MDV)超强毒Md5株(1000 PFU/只),所有鸡隔离饲养120 d。通过检测疫苗毒蚀斑数、疫苗毒复制情况、攻毒后体重差异、临床表现和病理变化综合评估各疫苗的保护力。【结果】7个批次疫苗的病毒蚀斑数均符合国家标准(2000 PFU/羽份),疫苗F的病毒蚀斑数最高(6467 PFU/羽份)。以1羽份剂量免疫1日龄SPF鸡后,疫苗F的复制速率相对较快。用Md5株攻毒后,攻毒对照组鸡体重减轻,且有93.3%(14/15)的鸡死亡,100%(15/15)剖检出现MD典型病变;G01~G07各免疫组鸡体重与空白对照组鸡相比,均无显著差异(P>0.05),死亡比例分别为0/14、3/15、5/15、0/14、0/13、0/15和1/15,剖检出现MD典型病理变化的比例为5/14、8/15、7/15、5/14、3/13、3/15和5/15,攻毒保护试验结果显示,7个批次的马立克病疫苗对鸡均具有一定保护力,保护指数为45.7%~73.3%。【结论】不同厂家生产的鸡马立克病疫苗对MDV超强毒Md5株的攻击具有相似的保护效果,二价苗的保护力(73.3%)高于单价疫苗。 【Objective】To understand the immune protection effects of different commercial Marek’s disease vaccines,and provide valuable data for Marek’s disease prevention and control,this study analyzed the immune protection of 7 batches/varieties(A-D,F-H)of CV1988 or CVI988+HVT commercial vaccine.【Method】A total of 1401-day-old SPF chickens were randomly divided into 9 groups,groups G01 to G07.G01 to G07(15 chickens/group)were immunized with Marek’s disease vaccine A-D and F-H according to the manufacturer’s recommended dose,respectively,while groups G08(challenge control group,15 chickens)and G09(blank control group,20 chickens)were not immunized.At 7 days of age,the chickens of groups G01 to G08 were intraperitoneally injected with Md5 strain(1000 PFU/bird).All chickens were raised to 120 days of age.The protective effect of each vaccine was evaluated through the examination of virus plaque numbers,vaccine replication,weight differences post-challenge,clinical manifestations,and pathological changes.【Result】The virus plaque number of all 7 vaccine batches confirmed to national standard(2000 PFU/feather),and the virus plaque number of vaccine F(6467 PFU/feather)was the highest.The replication rate of vaccine F was faster than other vaccines.After challenged with Md5 strain,the weight of the challenge control group chickens were decreased,and the unvaccinated chickens challenged with Md5 had 93.3%(14/15)mortality,and 100%(15/15)MD lesions.Compared with blank control group,there was no significant difference in body weight in groups G01 to G07(P>0.05).The mortality of vaccinated chickens in groups G01-G07 were 0/14,3/15,5/15,0/14,0/13,0/15 and 1/15,respectively.The MD lesion proportion of vaccinated chickens in groups G01-G07 were 5/14,8/15,7/15,5/14,3/13,3/15 and 5/15,respectively.The results of immune challenge protection test showed that 7 batches of Marek’s disease vaccine had a certain protective effect on chickens,and the protection index of these vaccines were 45.7%-73.3%.【Conclusion】Different manufacturer’s Marek’s disease vaccine demonstrated comparable protective effect against Md5 strain of MDV.Furthermore,the bivalent vaccine exhibited higher protection(73.3%)compared to the monovalent vaccine.
作者 杨慧明 蒲兴 党海斌 孙璐 张国中 YANG Huiming;PU Xing;DANG Haibin;SUN Lu;ZHANG Guozhong(College of Veterinary Medicine,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;Nanchang Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang 330096,China)
出处 《中国畜牧兽医》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第3期1267-1276,共10页 China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine
基金 中国农业大学2115人才工程(00109023)。
关键词 马立克病 商品化疫苗 攻毒保护试验 保护指数 Marek’s disease commercial vaccine challenge protection test protection index
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献41

  • 1金元昌,陈壮,李玉峰,袁志栋.抗性选育协同疫苗免疫对鸡羽囊马立克病毒载量的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2015,46(5):836-840. 被引量:1
  • 2李慧敏,罗琼,刘郁夫,郭凯,赵兵,温良海,陈瑞爱.马立克病病毒1型LZ1309株的分离鉴定与生物特性分析[J].中国兽医科学,2015,45(5):490-496. 被引量:4
  • 3朱良全,金丽霞,张万林,彭隽.鸡马立克氏病火鸡疱疹病毒(HVT)活疫苗蚀斑计数的影响因素[J].中国兽医杂志,2005,41(8):15-17. 被引量:1
  • 4张颖,刘长军,秦运安,张艳萍,张晓巍,郝永清.应用双重实时荧光定量PCR方法检测鸡马立克氏病血清1型病毒[J].中国预防兽医学报,2007,29(1):46-51. 被引量:16
  • 5Parvizi P, Read L R, Abdul-Careem M F, et al. Cytokine genc expression in splenic CD4^+ and CD8^+ T cell subsets of genetically resistant and susceptible chickens infected with Marek's disease virus [J]. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 2009, 132 (2-4): 209- 217.
  • 6Xing Z, Schat K A. Expression of cytokinc genes in Marek's disease virus infected chickens and chicken embryo fibroblast cultures [J]. J Immunol, 2000, 100(1): 70-76.
  • 7Jarosinski K W, Njaa B L, O'Connell P H, et al. Pro-inflammatory responses in chicken spleen and brain tissues after infection with very virulent plus Marek's disease virus [J]. Viral Immunol, 2005, 18(1): 148-161.
  • 8Islam A F, Wong C W, Walkden-Brown S W, et al. Immunosuppressive effects of Marek's disease virus (MDV) and herpcsvirus of turkeys (HVT) in broiler chickens and the protective effect of HVT vaccination against MDV challenge [J]. Avian Pathol, 2002, 31(5): 449-461.
  • 9Abdul-Carcem M F, Hunter B D, Sarson A J, et al. Host responses are induced in feathers of chickens infected with Marek's disease virus [J]. J Virol, 2008, 370(2): 323-332.
  • 10Djeraba A, Mussct E, Bernardet N, et al. Similar pattern of iNOS expression, NO production and cytokinc response in genetic and vaccination-acquired resistance to Marek's disease [J]. Vet lmmunol hnmunop, 2002, 85(1-2): 63-75.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部