期刊文献+

表现性评价——提高学生写作能力的“法宝”

Expressive Evaluation,A Magic Weapon to Improve Students’Writing Skills
下载PDF
导出
摘要 写作教学中大多采用总结性评价方式,总结性评价以教师为评价主体,这种评价方式对提高学生写作能力收效甚微,还存在评价目的不明确、评价主体单一、评价标准主观的问题。表现性评价是按照固定标准,在真实或接近真实的情境中对学生完成任务的过程和表现进行观察和判断的评价方式。它能够凸显写作活动中学生的主体地位,提高写作教学的关联度,对学生的实际表达和操作进行实时监控。教师可以在七年级上册第二单元写作活动环节尝试使用评价量表让学生学习、明确记叙文的标准,并且利用记叙文评价量表点评作文,让表现性评价贯穿学生写作过程。 Most of the writing teaching adopts summative evaluation,which takes teachers as the evaluation subject.This evaluation method has little effect on improving students’writing ability,and there are still some problems such as unclear evaluation purpose,single evaluation subject and subjective evaluation criteria.Performance evaluation is a way of observing and judging the process and performance of students completing tasks in real or near real situations according to fixed standards.It can highlight the principal position of students in writing activities,improve the relevance of writing teaching,and monitor students’actual expression and operation in real time.Teachers can try to use the assessment scale in the writing activities of Unit 2 of Volume 1 of Grade 7 to let students learn and clarify the standards of narrative writing,and use the narrative assessment scale to comment essays,so that performance evaluation can run through the writing process of students.
作者 陈好 李康澄 Chen Hao;Li Kangcheng(Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan,411201,China)
机构地区 湖南科技大学
出处 《语言与文化研究》 2024年第2期79-82,共4页 Language and Culture Research
基金 汉语言文学专业实践课程体系构建与实践教学改革综合研究(湘教通(2019)291号484)的阶段性成果。
关键词 表现性评价 评价量表 记叙文写作 写作能力 Performance evaluation Evaluation scale Narrative writing Writing ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献39

  • 1易凌峰.多元教学评价的发展与趋势[J].课程.教材.教法,1999,19(11):10-12. 被引量:81
  • 2中华人民共和国教育部.普通高中语文课程标准[s].人民教育出版社.2003:21-24.
  • 3布卢姆.教育评价[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1987..
  • 4比尔·约翰逊 李雁冰 主译.学生表现评定手册-场地设计和前景指南[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.173-179.
  • 5刘志军.走向理解的课程评价[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004.48,50,54.
  • 6科林·马什.初任教师手册[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2005:454
  • 7中华人民共和国教育部.全日制义务教育语文课程标准[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.
  • 8Stiggins, R. J. Design and development of performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987, 6 (3): 33--42.
  • 9Cohen, L. G., & Spenciner, L. J. Assessment of young children. New York: Longman Press, 1994.
  • 10Drake, F. D. Using alternative assessments to improve the teaching and learning of history. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education, 1997.

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部