摘要
耳背式助听器设计方案评价中存在的主观性和片面性问题一直是研究者关注的焦点。本研究综合运用了(AHP)层次分析法和(TOPSIS)逼近理想解排序法,通过文献研究、用户与专家问卷,科学构建了耳背式助听器评价因素体系。在三款耳背式助听器设计方案的比较中,采用AHP-TOPSIS方法进行综合评价,最终确定了最佳设计方案,为未来非处方助听器的重新设计提供了有益的借鉴和设计优化思路。
The subjectivity and one-sidedness issues present in the evaluation of behind-the-ear hearing aid design proposals have long been a focal point of researchers'attention.This study comprehensively employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)methods.Through literature research,user and expert questionnaires,a scientifically constructed evaluation criteria system for behind-the-ear hearing aids is established.In the comparative analysis of three behind-the-ear hearing aid design proposals,the AHP-TOPSIS method is used for a comprehensive assessment,ultimately determining the optimal design proposal.This provides valuable insights and design optimization ideas for the future redesign of over-the-counter hearing aids.
作者
姬文轩
朱兆华
祖翘楚
JI Wen-Xuan;ZHU Zhao-Hua;ZU Qiao-Chu(School of Architecture and Design,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou Jiangsu221116,China)
出处
《机电产品开发与创新》
2024年第2期81-85,共5页
Development & Innovation of Machinery & Electrical Products
关键词
耳背式助听器
(AHP)层次分析法
(TOPSIS)逼近理想解排序法
评价优选
Behind-the-ear hearing aids
Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)
Evaluation and selection
