期刊文献+

规范财富积累机制的三重逻辑

The Triple Logic of Regulating the Mechanism of Wealth Accumulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 党的二十大报告首次提出规范财富积累机制,反映出中国共产党对当前财富积累问题的精准把握和高度重视。新中国的财富积累经历了起步阶段、增长阶段和共享阶段三个历史时期,为规范财富积累机制出场奠定了深厚的理论与实践基础。规范财富积累机制是在坚持马克思财富思想的基础上对社会主义分配制度的完善和发展,具有主体激励、财富调节与行为约束的功能。新时代,规范财富积累机制要坚持其总体性原则,在法治框架内构建并完善合理有效的制度体系,推动财富积累实现高质量和可持续,财富分配差距持续缩小至合理水平,财富积累的全过程更加公平正义。 The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed for the first time to standardize the wealth accumulation mechanism,reflecting the CPC′s accurate grasp and great attention to the current wealth accumulation problem.The wealth accumulation of New China has gone through three historical periods:the initial stage,the growth stage and the sharing stage,which has laid a profound theoretical and practical foundation for the emergence of the wealth accumulation mechanism.The standardized wealth accumulation mechanism is the improvement and development of the socialist distribution system on the basis of adhering to Marx′s wealth thought,and has the functions of subject incentive,wealth regulation and behavioral restraint.In the new era,to regulate the wealth accumulation mechanism,we must adhere to its overall principle,build and improve a reasonable and effective institutional system within the framework of the rule of law,promote wealth accumulation to achieve high quality and sustainability,continue to narrow the wealth distribution gap to a reasonable level,and make the whole process of wealth accumulation fairer.
作者 马硕 MA Shuo(Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
机构地区 同济大学
出处 《甘肃理论学刊》 2024年第1期108-118,共11页 Gansu Theory Research
基金 上海市教委科研项目“中国式现代化与伟大建党精神研究”(WZ0070220231489) 上海市社科规划“研究阐释党的二十大精神”专项课题(2023VZH001)的阶段性成果。
关键词 财富积累机制 规范 历史逻辑 理论逻辑 实践逻辑 wealth accumulation mechanisms specification historical logic theoretical logic practice logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1诺曼.莱文,张亮.从“西方马克思主义”到西方“马克思学”——诺曼·莱文教授访谈录[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2006,43(6):5-14. 被引量:26
  • 2Blount, S. , 1995, "When Social Outcomes Aren' t Fair: The Effect of Causal Attributions on Preference", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, pp. 131-144.
  • 3Bolton, G.E. and Oekenfels, A. , 2000, "ERC-A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition", American Economic Review, 90(1) , pp. 166-193.
  • 4Bolton, G. E. and Zwick, R. , 1995, "Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining", Games and Economic Behavior, 10, pp. 95-121.
  • 5Camerer, C.F. , 2003, Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • 6科林·凯莫勒著/贺京同等译.2006.《行为博弈-对策略互动的实验研究》,中译本,中国人民大学出版社.
  • 7Dufwenberg, M. and Kirchsteiger, G. , 2004, "A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity" ~ Games and Economic Behavior, 47, pp. 268- 298.
  • 8Falk, A. , Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. , 2003, "On the Nature of Fair Behavior", Economic Inquiry, 41, pp. 20-26.
  • 9Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. , 1999, "A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, pp. 817-868.
  • 10Fischbacher, U. , 2007, "Z-Tree : Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Exper/ments", Experimental Economics, 10, pp. 171- 178.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部