中国省域环境规制与科技创新耦合协调发展研究

Coupling Coordination Development of Environmental Regulation and Scientificand Technological Innovation in Chinese Provinces

环境规制与科技创新耦合协调发展能为实现经济增长与生态文明提供强有力的支撑。该文构建环境规制与科技创新水平评价指标体系,利用耦合协调度模型测算2009—2020年中国30个省域环境规制与科技创新的耦合协调度,并对耦合协调度的时空分布格局进行分析。结果表明:研究期内中国30个省域环境规制与科技创新的耦合协调度整体偏低,尚未达到良性耦合协调发展状态,但呈现上升趋势,增幅呈现“西高东低”特征;各地区耦合协调度发展不均衡,整体呈现“东高西低、南高北低”的空间分布格局,高水平耦合协调区域逐渐从东部沿海向内陆扩张;依据协调等级和特征将各省域划分为创新主动型、技术进步型、环境约束型、传统被动型和创新滞后型,并提出环境规制应结合地区创新能力实施差异化的区域政策等建议。

The coupling coordination development of environmental regulation and scientific and technological innovation can provide strong support for economic growth and ecological civilization.This paper constructed the evaluation index system of environmental regulation and scientific and technological innovation,then measured the coupling coordination degree of environmental regulation and scientific and technological innovation in 30 Chinese provinces(municipalities and autonomous regions)from 2009 to 2020,and finally analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution pattern of the coupling coordination degree.The results showed that the coupling coordination degree of environmental regulation and scientific and technological innovation in China showed an increasing trend,and the growth rate was characterized by"high in the west and low in the east".But the coupling coordination degree was low and had not yet reached the state of benign coupling coordination development.There are regional differences in the coupling coordination degree,with an overall spatial distribution pattern of"high in the east and low in the west,high in the south and low in the north".The high-level coupling coordination areas gradually expand from the eastern coast to the inland.According to the coupling coordination level and characteristics,Chinese provinces(municipalities and autonomous regions)are divided into five categories,namely,innovation initiative mode,technological progress mode,environmental constraint mode,traditional passive mode and innovation lag mode,and it is proposed that environmental regulation should implement differentiated regional policies according to regional innovation capabilities.