期刊文献+

群组视角观点采择:自动加工的证据

Group Perspective Taking:Evidence of Spontaneous Processing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于经典的视觉观点采择范式,本研究探讨人们如何采择群组视角观点。研究创设了自我视角信息与群组视角信息一致与不一致条件,比较两种条件下被试对自我视角信息判断的反应时。若被试在视角信息不一致条件下的反应时显著长于其在一致条件下时,提示被试在判断自我视角信息时受到了群组视角信息的干扰,即自动加工了群组视角的观点。结果显示,相比视角信息一致条件,被试在视角信息不一致条件下反应时更长。当虚拟人物群组被箭头替代后,被试自动加工群组视角信息效应消失。该结果揭示,人们会自动地加工社会群组的视觉信息,且该效应不能由物理层面的指向所解释。 Understanding what others think and see is crucial for social interactions.Previous studies have shown that people can spontaneously infer what an individual sees.Still,it is unclear whether they can spontaneously calculate what a group sees at a group level.To investigate this question,this study employed a novel visual perspective-taking paradigm that required participants to judge their own perspective from the picture that four avatars who either looked at the same objects or looked at different objects.We found that participants could not easily ignore what the group saw when making self-perspective judgments.This effect occurred even when the avatars looked at different objects,but not when they were replaced by arrows with similar low-level features.This suggests that people can spontaneously calculate what a group sees,and this process is driven by the social group information,rather than by the physical directionality.
作者 何晓燕 杨滢巧 杨丰伊 尹军 HE Xiaoyan;YANG Yingqiao;YANG Fengyi;YIN Jun(Department of Psychology,Ningbo University,Center of Group Behavior and Social Psychological Service,Ningbo 315211,China;Department of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2024年第4期200-210,共11页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 浙江省哲学社会科学领军人才培育专项(青年英才培育:21QNYC12ZD)。
关键词 视觉观点采择 群组视角 自我视角 自动加工 visual perspective-taking group-perspective self-perspective spontaneous processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献46

  • 1陈英和,崔艳丽,王雨晴.幼儿心理理论与情绪理解发展及关系的研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):527-532. 被引量:56
  • 2陈友庆,郭本禹.聋儿的心理理论发展特点及影响因素[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):382-388. 被引量:26
  • 3王伟平,苏彦捷.孤独症儿童基于眼睛注视的社会性注意[J].中国特殊教育,2006(6):12-17. 被引量:5
  • 4李晓东,黄艳秋,刘萍,徐健.成人在错误信念任务上的表现[J].心理学探新,2007,27(3):44-47. 被引量:14
  • 5Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating neuropsychologieal evidence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 572-577.
  • 6Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 190-201.
  • 7Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Bernstein, D. M., Atance, C., Loftus, G. R., & Meltzoff, A. (2004). We saw it all along visual hindsight bias in children and adults. Psychological Science, 15, 264-267.
  • 9Birch, S. A. J., & Bloom, P. (2004). Understanding children's and adults' limitations in mental state reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 255-260.
  • 10Birch, S. A. J., & Bloom, P. (2007). The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychological Science, 18, 382-386.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部