摘要
在当下的世界电影史写作中,各种研究框架不断涌现,同样也存在亟待厘清的概念误用现象。“民族电影/国别电影”体现了反好莱坞中心主义的多元视野,但无法解决电影史研究中的“跨国性”问题。“少数电影/小国电影”可以有效描绘“后冷战—全球化”时期弱势国家的电影境况,但“小国”概念需要被严格界定。“世界电影/全球电影”虽然被指忽略了帝国主义在国际贸易中对殖民地的压迫,但更具理论的包容性和开放性。
In the current world film history writing,a variety of research frameworks are emerging,and there are also some phenomena of conceptual misuse that need to be clarified.“National cinema/country cinema”reflects the pluralistic vision of anti-Hollywood-centrism,but it cannot solve the“transnational”problem in the study of cinema history.“Minor cinema/small-nation cinema”can effectively describe the situation of cinema in weak countries in the era of post-Cold War-globalization,but the concept of“small nation”needs to be strictly defined.“World cinema/global cinema”,while allegedly ignoring the imperialist oppression of colonies in international trade,is academically more inclusive and open.
出处
《电影艺术》
北大核心
2024年第2期75-81,共7页
Film Art
关键词
世界电影史
全球电影
世界电影
小国电影
民族电影
history of world cinema
global cinema
world cinema
small-nation cinema
national cinema