摘要
区块链技术具备去中心化、加盖时间戳、非对称加密等自身特性,契合当今司法实践的发展方向,正不断融入确权与存证领域中。这一技术在提供底层支持的前提下,还存在更深层次的制度意蕴,能够实现技术证明与法律证明的良性互动。但是,目前的区块链存证技术对电子证据证据资格的认定仍有局限性,法院对区块链电子证据的真实性、关联性、合法性等要素审查存在适法混乱问题。因此,未来仍有必要构建科学、完善的制度体系及其规范化思路,确立相关行业标准和规范,同时在审判实践中形成对区块链电子存证审查的二元视角,完善相关审查规则,真正解决司法应用难题。
Blockchain technology has its own characteristics such as decentralization,timestamp stamping,and asymmetric encryption,which is in line with the development direction of today's judicial practice and is constantly integrating into the field of rights confirmation and evidence storage.On the premise of providing underlying support,this technology also has deeper institutional implications,which can achieve a positive interaction between technical proof and legal proof.However,the current blockchain evidence storage technology still has limitations in determining the qualification of electronic evidence,and there is a legal confusion in the court's examination of the authenticity,relevance,legality and other elements of blockchain electronic evidence.Therefore,it is still necessary to build a scientifically sound institutional system and its standardized approach in the future,establish relevant industry standards and norms,and form a binary perspective on blockchain electronic evidence review in trial practice,improve relevant review rules,and truly solve judicial application problems.
作者
赵锐
黄贺
Zhao Rui;Huang He
出处
《南海法学》
2024年第1期99-112,共14页
The South China Sea Law Journal
基金
2022年度国家社科基金项目“互联网内容产业版权交易的制度变革与创新研究”(22BFX100)
2022年度山西省高等学校教学改革创新项目“新文科视域下的知识产权人才培养模式与实践研究”(J20220702)
2021年度山西省研究生教育改革研究课题“知识产权法专题”(2021YJJG259)
2023年度山西省研究生创新项目“区块链电子存证证据资格认定的实践困境与规则优化”(SY2023017)。
关键词
区块链
电子证据
证据资格
证据三性
blockchain
electronic evidence
competency of evidence
the Three Qualities of Evidence