期刊文献+

从特意排除规则对等同原则的限制看专利撰写技巧

Patent Drafting Skills Viewed from the Restriction of the Intentional Exclusion Rule on the Principle of Equivalence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于《最高人民法院知识产权法庭裁判要旨(2020)》和《最高人民法院知识产权法庭裁判要旨(2021)》中的两个典型案例,分析何种情况会导致特意排除规则的适用,进而形成对等同原则的限制,并从判决要点和涉案专利文件中归纳总结相应的申请文件撰写技巧,以帮助专利权人避免在日后专利侵权诉讼中使用等同原则时存在过多限制,同时对高质量专利申请文件的撰写具有一定启发意义。 Based on two typical cases in the“Judgment Essentials of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court(2020)”and“Judgment Essentials of the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court(2021)”,this paper analyzes what situations may lead to the application of the intentional exclusion rule,thereby forming a restriction on the principle of equivalence,and summarizes the corresponding application document drafting skills from the key judgment points and the patent documents involved,to help the patentee avoid excessive restrictions when using the principle of equivalence in future patent infringement litigation,and to provide some inspiration for drafting high-quality patent application documents.
作者 徐苏明 闫冬 XU Suming;YAN Dong(Beijing Lonyuan IP Agency Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100080,China)
出处 《专利代理》 2024年第1期58-62,67,共6页 Patent Agency
关键词 特意排除 等同原则 最高院 侵权 撰写 intentional exclusion principle of equivalence the Supreme People's Court infringement draft
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部