转换性使用视角下影视剧解说类二次创作短视频的合法性探析

An Analysis of the Legitimacy of the Second Creation of Short Videos in Film and Television Drama Interpretation from the Perspective of Transformative Use

【目的】通过探究影视剧解说类二次创作短视频的合法性问题,为我国著作权理论发展及司法审判实践提供建议。【方法】通过分析国外转换性使用的司法实践,结合我国实际情况分析引入转换性使用规则存在的问题,并根据二次创作作品的种类不同进行分类研究其合法性。【结果】可以通过引入转换性使用规则,增加合理使用制度适用灵活性,弥补法律缺陷,解决法官对二次创作短视频案件缺乏明确规定问题,但是仍存在判断标准不明确,难以形式上融入等问题。【结论】对于转换性使用的判断,应先判断其是否构成内容性转换,如果不构成,再判断其是否构成目的性转换,同时也要针对不同类型的影视剧视频的特征进行综合判断。

[Purposes]This paper aims to explore the legitimacy of secondary creation of short video,film and television series commentary videos,and provide suggestions for the development of copyright theory and judicial trial practice in China.[Methods]By analyzing the judicial practice of convertible use in foreign countries and combining with the actual situation in China,the problems in introducing convertible use rules are analyzed,and the legitimacy issues are classified and studied based on the different types of secondary creative works.[Findings]By introducing transformative use rules,the flexibility of the fair use system can be increased,legal deficiencies can be remedied,and the problem of judges lacking clear regulations on secondary short video creation cases can be solved.However,there are still issues such as unclear judgment standards and difficulty in integrating them into the form.[Conclusions]In the judgment of transformative use,it is necessary to first determine whether it constitutes a content based transformation,and if it does not,then determine whether it constitutes a purposive transformation;And when using a transformative perspective,it is also necessary to consider the comprehensive judgment based on the characteristics of different types of film and television dramas and videos.