期刊文献+

数字技术赋能意识形态风险防控的三维论域 被引量:1

The Three-dimensional Domain of the Prevention and Control of Ideological Risk Enabled by Digital Technology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 意识形态工作事关党的前途命运与国家长治久安,事关民族凝聚力与向心力。在数字全球化浪潮的席卷下,数字技术成为党创新执政的“利刃”。数字技术赋能意识形态风险防控的意义在于增强新形势下意识形态领域重大风险的抗变能力,推进物质文明与精神文明相协调的现代化;数字技术赋能意识形态风险防控的逻辑在于数字技术在批量化数据采集、协同化分析处理、可视化动态呈现和精准化研判追索等方面具备的优势与意识形态风险防控的需求内在契合。数字技术有力地增强了意识形态风险应对工作的主动性和主导权,但数字技术在赋能意识形态风险防控的实践中仍存在技术壁垒、技术“负能”、技术伦理等现实问题与挑战,亟须通过强化软硬件技术支持、培育复合型人才队伍、建构全方位防控体系等手段予以逐个击破,进而全面激活数字技术赋能意识形态风险的防控效能。 Ideology has a close relation to the future and destiny of the Communist Party of China and the long-term sta-bility of the country,as well as national cohesion and centripetal force.Under the sweeping trend of digital globalization,digital technology has become a significant magic weapon and key tool of the Party's innovative governance,because it enables the pre-vention and control of ideological risks,which is conducive to enhancing the resilience to major risks in the ideological field under the new situation,maintaining national security and social stability,and helping to smoothly promote the great process of Chinese path to modernization.The advantages of digital technology in batch data collection,collaborative analysis and processing,visual dynamic presentation,as well as precise analysis and tracing,are inherent in the demand for ideological risk prevention and con-trol,which can effectively enhance the initiative and leadership of ideological risk response work.However,there are still practi-cal problems and challenges in the empowerment practice of digital technology,such as technological barriers,technological negativity",and technological ethics.It is necessary to promote the integration and interaction between digital technology and i-deological forms of work by strengthening software and hardware technical support,cultivating an inter-disciplinary talents team,and constructing a comprehensive prevention and control system,in order to solve the above problems one after another and fully activate the effectiveness of preventing and controlling the ideological risks in the digital era.
作者 张治夏 ZHANG Zhi-xia(School of Marxism,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2024年第1期49-55,共7页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 天津市社科规划项目重点项目(项目批准号:TJKS20—004) 天津市高校科研项目“习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究”。
关键词 数字时代 意识形态风险 数字技术 The digital age ideological risks digital technology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1多西 弗里曼.技术进步与经济理论[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1992..
  • 2尼科里斯G 普里高津I 著 罗久里 陈奎宁 译.探索复杂性[M].成都: 四川教育出版社,1986.1-43.
  • 3格林伍德 爱德华滋.人类环境和自然系统[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1987.490.
  • 4Zipf G K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort,Wesley, 1947.
  • 5Haggett P. Network Models in Geography, St. Martin's Press, 1969.
  • 6Hagerstrand F. A Monte-Carlo Approach to Diffusion, Archies Europeanes de Sociologoe, Vol.6:43 - 67, 1965.
  • 7Forrester J W. Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, 1961.
  • 8薛定锷.生命是什么?中译本,北京:科学出版社,1962.
  • 9Simmons J W. The Organization of Urban System, Systems of Cities, 1978.
  • 10Wilson A G. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling, Pion, London: 1970.

共引文献1552

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部