期刊文献+

分娩前超声检查对不同营养状况孕妇胎儿体质量估计效果

Accuracy of prenatal ultrasound examination in estimating fetal weight in pregnant women with different nutritional status
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较超声Hadlock法与临床公式法(袁东法)评估胎儿体质量的符合率。方法回顾分析2020年1—4月在青岛市妇女儿童医院产科住院分娩的1715例孕妇的临床资料,按孕前体质量指数(BMI)分为体质量过低(<18.5 kg/m 2)组177例、体质量正常(18.5~23.9 kg/m 2)组1118例、体质量超标(24.0~27.9 kg/m 2)组317例、肥胖(≥28.0 kg/m 2)组103例。分别应用超声Hadlock法与袁东法估测胎儿体质量,比较两种方法计算的估计胎儿体质量与实际出生体质量的差异。结果4组超声Hadlock法评估胎儿体质量的准确率均明显高于袁东法(χ2=25.212~435.840,P<0.01);Hadlock法评估胎儿体质量的准确率4组差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.392,P>0.05),袁东法评估胎儿体质量的准确率随BMI升高而降低,差异有统计学意义(χ2=59.34,P<0.01)。结论Hadlock法评估胎儿体质量的准确率明显高于袁东法,且不受孕妇孕前BMI影响。 Objective To investigatethe coincidence rate between the Hadlock ultrasound method and the clinical formula method(Yuan Dong method)in assessing estimated fetal weight(EFW).Methods A retrospective analysiswas performed for the clinical data of 1715 pregnant women who were hospitalized and gave birth in Department of Obstetrics,Qingdao Women and Children’s Hospital,from January to April 2020,and according to the body mass index(BMI)before pregnancy,they were divi-ded into underweight(BMI<18.5 kg/m 2)group with 177 women,normal weight(18.5-23.9 kg/m 2)group with 1118 women,overweight(24.0-27.9 kg/m 2)group with 317 women,and obese(≥28.0 kg/m 2)group with 103 women.Fetal weight was estimated using the Hadlock ultrasound method and the Yuan Dong method,and the two methods were compared in terms of the difference between EFW and actual birthweight.Results The Hadlock method had a significantly higher accuracy than the Yuan Dong methodin estimating fetal weight in each group(χ2=25.212-435.840,P<0.01).There was no significant difference in the accuracy of the Hadlock method in estimatingfetal weight betweenthe four groups(χ2=1.392,P>0.05),while the accuracy of the Yuan Dong method in estimating fetal weight decreased significantly with the increase in BMI(χ2=59.34,P<0.01).Conclusion The Hadlock method has a significantly higher accuracy than the Yuan Dong method in estimating fetal weight and is not affected by the BMI of pregnant women before pregnancy.
作者 张蔼 王田华 于学娟 王玉婷 姜洁璇 范冬梅 ZHANG Ai;WANG Tianhua;YU Xuejuan;WANG Yuting;JIANG Jiexuan;FAN Dongmei(Centre for Fetal Medicine of Qingdao Woman and Children’s Hospital,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266011,China)
出处 《青岛大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2024年第1期81-84,共4页 Journal of Qingdao University(Medical Sciences)
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(202005030-272)。
关键词 孕妇 人体质量指数 超声检查 产前 估测 胎儿体重 pregnant women body mass index ultrasonography,prenatal forecasting fetal weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献32

  • 1Chen CM.Overview of obesity in China's Mainland[J].Obes Rev,2008,9(Suppl 1):14-21.
  • 2Catalano PM.Management of obesity in pregnancy[J].Obstet Gynecol,2007,109(2 Pt 1):419-433.
  • 3American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.ACOG Committee Opinion number 315,September2005.Obesity in pregnancy[J].Obstet Gynecol,2005,106(3):671-675.
  • 4Peregrine E,O'Brien P,Jauniaux E.Clinical and ultra-sound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of laborat term[J].Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2007,29(3):304-309.
  • 5Farrell T,Holmes R,Stone P.The effect of body mass in-dex on three methods of fetal weight estimation[J].BJOG,2002,109(6):651-657.
  • 6Heer IM,Kumper C,Vogtle N,et al.Analysis of factors in-fluencing the ultrasonic fetal weight estimation[J].FetalDiagn Ther,2008,23(3):204-210.
  • 7Field NT,Piper JM,Langer O.The effect of maternal obe-sity on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation[J].ObstetGynecol,1995,86(1):102-107.
  • 8Ehrenberg HM,Mercer BM,Catalano PM.The influenceof obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2004,191(3):964-968.
  • 9于冬梅,翟凤英,赵丽云,刘爱东,于文涛,贾凤梅,张继国,李婕.中国2006年巨大儿发生率及其影响因素[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,16(1):11-13. 被引量:145
  • 10韩素新,周剑利,陈海红,韩萍.巨大儿出生体质量预测方法的评价[J].山东医药,2009,49(14):79-80. 被引量:7

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部