摘要
[目的/意义]在新文科和跨学科融合发展的时代背景下,厘清图书情报学理论方法跨学科影响力及形成机制,对于构建信息资源管理学科的学术体系,促进跨学科融合发展,切实提升信息资源管理学科的学术话语权具有重要的理论意义和实践意义。[方法/过程]选取了28名非图书情报学科领域科研人员进行深度访谈和焦点访谈,借鉴扎根理论研究范式对原始访谈数据进行编码分析,构建了图书情报学理论方法跨学科影响力成因要素研究模型。[结果/结论]研究结果显示,图书情报学理论方法在跨学科领域的影响力可以划分为:显性影响、隐性影响、导向影响和潜在影响4个维度。此外还发现,主体因素、学科因素、社会环境和学术媒介是影响图书情报学理论方法跨学科影响力的重要因素。在此基础上,文章提出了图书情报学科需要以国家战略为导向,完善图书情报学科的理论体系和方法体系,扩大学术交流等切实提升图书情报学科学术影响力的对策与建议。
[Purpose/significance]In the context of the development of new humanities and cross-disciplinary,clarifying the cross-disciplinary influence and formation mechanism of the theoretical methods of library and information science(LIS)has important theoretical and practical significance for constructing the academic discourse system of information resource management discipline and effectively enhancing the academic status of information resource management in cross-disciplinary construction.[Method/process]This paper selected 28 researchers from non-LIS fields for in-depth and focus interviews.Drawing on the grounded theory research paradigm,the original interview data were encoded and analyzed,and a research model on the formation mechanism of cross-disciplinary influence of LIS theoretical methods was constructed.[Result/conclusion]The research results show that the influence of LIS theory and methods on cross-disciplinary research can be divided into four dimensions:explicit influence,implicit influence,directed influence,and potential influence.In addition,it was found that research subjects,disciplinary factors,social environment,and academic media are important factors that affect the cross-disciplinary influence of LIS theory and methods.On this basis,it is proposed that the LIS field should be guided by national strategies,improve its theoretical and methodological system,expand academic exchanges,and continuously enhance its academic influence.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
北大核心
2024年第4期67-74,共8页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
关键词
图书情报学
跨学科影响力
扎根理论
隐性影响
学科交叉
library and information science(LIS)
cross-disciplinary influence
grounded theory
implicit influence
disciplinary intersection