期刊文献+

MRI征象联合炎症指标对肿块型早期浸润性乳腺癌淋巴血管侵犯预测价值

Value of MRI signs combined with inflammatory indexes in predicting lymphovascular invasion in lumpy early invasive breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨术前磁共振成像(MRI)征象联合炎症指标对肿块型早期浸润性乳腺癌淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)的预测价值。方法:收集2018~2020年广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的89例术前行磁共振增强检查的肿块型早期浸润性乳腺癌女性患者。根据术后病理检查结果将患者分为LVI(+)组与LVI(-)组,单因素分析评估两组患者术前MRI征象、炎症指标及病理学特征与LVI的关系,采用多因素logistic回归筛选危险因素并建立MRI征象模型和MRI征象联合炎症指标模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的预测效能。AUC的差异比较采用Z检验。结果:LVI(+)组和LVI(-)组间术前外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、T分期、毛刺征、时间信号曲线(TIC)类型、瘤周水肿及表观扩散系数(ADC)值差异具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示Ⅲ型TIC、毛刺征及瘤周水肿是LVI的独立危险因素(OR值分别为18.765、7.965、4.018,均P<0.05)。MRI征象模型(TIC类型+瘤周水肿+毛刺征)和MRI征象联合炎症指标模型(TIC类型+瘤周水肿+毛刺征+NLR)的AUC分别为0.866、0.879。Z检验显示两个模型之间AUC比较,差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.248,P=0.804)。结论:MRI征象联合炎症指标模型(TIC类型+瘤周水肿+毛刺征+NLR)有助于预测肿块型早期浸润性乳腺癌患者的LVI情况。 Objective:To explore the value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)signs combined with inflammatory indexes in predicting lymphovascular invasion(LVI)in lumpy early invasive breast cancer.Methods:A total of 89 female patients with lumpy early invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance enhancement examination at the Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were collected.The patients were divided into LVI(+)and LVI(-)groups according to the postoperative pathological findings.The relationship between preoperative MRI signs,inflammatory indexes and pathological features with LVI in the two groups was evaluated by univariate analysis.Multivariate logistic regression was used to screen for risk factors,and the model of MRI signs and the model of MRI signs combined with inflammatory indexes were established.The diagnostic efficacy of the model was assessed using the area under the curve(AUC)of the receiver operating characteristic(ROC).The z-test was used to compare the differences in AUC.Results:The differences in preoperative peripheral blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR),T-stage,spicule sign,type of time intensity curve(TIC),peritumoural oedema and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values were statistically significant between the LVI(+)and LVI(-)groups(all P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that typeⅢTIC,spicule sign and peritumoural oedema were independent risk factors for LVI(OR=18.765,7.965 and 4.018,respectively;all P<0.05).The AUC of the MRI signs model(TIC type+peritumoural oedema+spicule sign)and the MRI signs combined with inflammatory indexes model(TIC type+peritumoural oedema+spicule sign+NLR)were 0.866 and 0.879,respectively.The Z-test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the AUC between the two models(Z=-0.248,P=0.804).Conclusion:MRI signs combined with inflammatory indexes model(TIC type+peritumoural oedema+spicule sign+NLR)can help predict LVI in patients with lumpy early invasive breast cancer.
作者 韦姗姗 罗显廷 朱旭娜 黄雷 刘宇 苏丹柯 刘丽东 WEI Shanshan;LUO Xianting;ZHU Xuna;HUANG Lei;LIU Yu;SU Danke;LIU Lidong(Medical Imaging Center,Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital,Guangxi Key Clinical Specialty,Nanning 530021,China;Dominant Cultivation Discipline of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital,Nanning 530021,China;Guangxi Engineering Center in Biomedical Material for Tissue and Organ Regeneration,Guangxi Medical University,Nanning 530021,China)
出处 《广西医科大学学报》 CAS 2024年第3期436-443,共8页 Journal of Guangxi Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81971591) 广西科技计划资助项目(No.桂AD20238096) 广西重点研发计划项目资助(No.桂科AB18126041)。
关键词 乳腺癌 磁共振成像 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 淋巴血管侵犯 breast cancer magnetic resonance imaging neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio lymphovascular invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1张碧珊,付旷,郭丽丽,孔德华.磁共振DWI及其ADC值在乳腺良恶性病变中的应用[J].哈尔滨医科大学学报,2020(3):298-301. 被引量:14
  • 2Giuliano AE,Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer [J]. Ann Surg ,1994,220(3) :391 - 401.
  • 3Turner RR,Ollila DW, Krasne DL,et al. Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast earcinoma[J]. Ann Surg, 1997,226(3) :271 - 278.
  • 4Lyman GH,Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage breast cancer [J]. J Clin 0ncol,2005,23(30) :7703 - 7720.
  • 5Kamath V,Giuliano R,Dauway E,et al. Characteristics o the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer predict further involvement o1[ higher echelon nodes in the axilla: a study to evaluate the need for complete axillary lymph node dissection[J]. Arch Surg ,2001,136(6) :688 - 692.
  • 6Stitzenberg KB, eyer AA, Stern SL, et al. Extracapsular extension of the sentinel lymph node metastasis: a predictor of nonsentinel node tumor burden [J]. Ann Surg,2003,237(5) :607 - 612.
  • 7Kim T,Giuliano A_E, Lyman G H. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast carcinoma : a meta-analysis [ J ]. Cancer, 2006, 106 ( 1 ) : 4 - 16.
  • 8Van Zee K, Manasseh DE, Bevilacqua JL, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2003,10( 10): 1140- 1151.
  • 9Barranger E, Coutant C, Flahault A, et al. An axilla scoring system to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat ,2005,91 (2) : 113 - 119.
  • 10Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, e! al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013[J]. Ann Onco1,2013,24(9) :2206 - 2223.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部