期刊文献+

血清Gal-3与CD105联合检测与心电图对急性冠脉综合征、稳定型心绞痛诊断价值比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究血清半乳糖凝集素-3(Gal-3)与内皮糖蛋白(CD105)联合检测与心电图对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)、稳定型心绞痛(SA)诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2018年12月至2020年12月在本院心血管内科进行治疗的186例冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(CHD)患者的病历资料,按照疾病类型分为两组,ACS组113例,SA组73例。比较两组患者收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、空腹血糖(FBG)、胆固醇(CHOL)、甘油三脂(TG)、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、Gal-3、CD105水平;采用血清Gal-3联合CD105检测与心电图ACS、SA进行检查,ACS记为阳性,SA记为阴性,分析其诊断价值。结果两组患者的年龄、BMI、性别、疾病史、吸烟人数、SBP、DBP、FBG、CHOL、TG、HDL、LDL相比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ACS组患者Gal-3与CD105水平明显高于SA组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,Gal-3、CD105诊断急性冠脉综合征的AUC分别为0.755、0.945,将Gal-3、CD105纳入Logistic回归分析显示,联合诊断急性冠脉综合征的AUC为0.957,诊断急性冠脉综合征的准确性高。Gal-3联合CD105的AUC显著大于Gal-3;根据最佳临界值,当Gal-3联合CD105高于32.09时,其敏感度为93.8%,特异度为98.6%。Gal-3联合CD105检测诊断急性冠脉综合征敏感度为93.8%,特异度为98.6%;心电图检查诊断急性冠脉综合征的灵敏度为92.04%,特异度为95.89%,比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论血清Gal-3与CD105联合检测与心电图对急性冠脉综合征、稳定型心绞痛诊断价值均较高,且诊断价值无明显差异,值得临床推广。
出处 《实验与检验医学》 CAS 2023年第6期722-724,728,共4页 Experimental and Laboratory Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献137

  • 1无.慢性稳定性心绞痛诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(3):195-206. 被引量:2044
  • 2CUI Song,LUe Shu-zheng,CHEN Yun-dai,HE Guo-xiang,LIU Jian-ping,SONG Zhi-yuan,SHU Mao-qin,HU Hou-yuan,RAN Bo-li,JING Tao.Relationship between intravascular ultrasound imaging features of coronary plaques and soluble CD105 level in patients with coronary heart disease[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(7):595-597. 被引量:7
  • 3Lawson WE, Hui JC, Lang G. Treatment benefit in the enhanced external counterpulsation consortium. Cardiology, 2000,94 ( 1 ) :31-35.
  • 4Ryden L, Standl E, Bartnic M, et al. Guideline on diabetes, prediabetes and cardiovascular disease:executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the Euopean Association for the Study of Diabetes(EASD). Eur Heart J,2007,28( 1 ) :88-136.
  • 5Crawford MH, Bernstein SJ, Deedwania PC, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines ( Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for Pacing and Electrophysiology.J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34(3) :912-948.
  • 6Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976 :54(3) :522-523.
  • 7O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,36(1) :326-340.
  • 8Gibbons Pal, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-sunanary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003,41 ( 1 ) : 159-168.
  • 9Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, et al. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation, 2004,110(10) :1245-1250.
  • 10Girman CJ, Rhodes T, Mercuri M,et al. The metabolic syndrome and risk of major coronary events in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) and the Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherescleresis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS). Am J Cardiol,2004,93 ( 2 ) : 136-141.

共引文献2870

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部