中国青少年社会与情感能力第二轮测评技术报告

The Technical Report on the 2^(nd) Round OECD Survey of Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescence

本技术报告基于中国济南参加2023年社会与情感能力(Survey on Social and Emotional Skills,SSES)的测评数据,对第二轮测评工具在中国文化下的心理测量学特征进行分析。本报告简要介绍了学生问卷的开发和实施过程、社会与情感能力指标体系、问卷主要组成部分、数据集的主要内容,并对数据质量进行了分析。分析结果表明,济南参试学生参试态度认真积极,参试率和有效应答率高,但是10岁组产生了高分翘尾现象;采用ω系数和α系数来衡量分量表的信度,结果表明绝大多数分量表信度良好;运用验证性因子分析逐一检验社会与情感能力各个分量表的效度,发现拟合度较为满意;多组验证性因子分析表明,这些分量表跨性别测量等值性好于跨年龄组等值性,故在考察青少年社会与情感子能力的年龄差异时,对于等值性较差的分量表数据应慎重使用。

Based on data from the 2023 Survey on Social and Emotional Skills(SSES)in Jinan,China,this technical report analyzes the psychometric characteristics of the second round of assessment tools under Chinese culture.The report presents a brief introduction of the development and implementation process of the student questionnaire,the subscales of the social and emotional skills,the main components of the questionnaire,the main content of the data set,and the analysis of data quality.The results showed that the students in Jinan had a positive attitude towards the Survey,with high participation rate and valid response rate.However,the frequency distributions of younger cohort showed a tall right tail.The coefficients ω’s and α’s represented that most of the subscales had good reliability.Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the validity(fitness)of each subscale of social and emotional skills were satisfactory.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis showed that the cross-gender measure invariance of these subscales was better than that of cross-cohorts,so the data of these subscales should be used with caution when examining the age-differences among adolescence.