摘要
司法评鉴本质上是一种“实践理性”活动,当前我国司法评鉴呈现出明显的缘木求鱼倾向。伤害司法的评鉴有四种特质,包括牺牲司法内在逻辑、颠倒手段与目的、违悖一般生活常识以及掉入“钱穆制度陷阱”。就最低判准而言,只有不伤害司法的评鉴,才可能是好的司法评鉴。
The essence of judicial evaluation is“practical rationality”.At present,China's judicial evaluation shows an obvious tendency to seek fish from wood.There are four characteristics in the evaluation of harmful justice,including sacrificing the internal logic of justice,reversing means and purposes,violating general knowledge of life,and falling into the“Qian Mu system trap”.As far as the minimum criterion is concerned,only the evaluation that does not harm the judiciary may be good and suitable.
作者
周赟
ZHOU Yun(Law School,Xiamen University,Xiamen,Fujian 361005)
出处
《公共治理研究》
2024年第2期87-98,共12页
PUBLIC GOVERNANCE RESEARCH
基金
2022年度国家社科基金后期资助重点课题“司法评鉴的应然逻辑及制度构造”(编号:22FFXA003)。
关键词
司法评鉴
伤害司法之四种评鉴
实践理性
钱穆制度陷阱
judicial evaluation
four kinds of evaluation harming justice
practical rationality
Qian Mu system trap