企业职务犯罪刑事合规中的监检衔接

The Connection Between Supervision and Inspection in the Criminal Compliance of Enterprise Duty Crimes

涉企职务犯罪刑事合规在改革实践中因公权力机关之间程序衔接不畅而收效甚微。其中,职务犯罪刑事合规的开展以监察机关在调查终结后将案件移送至检察机关为前提,有限的合规考察期、职务犯罪监察措施的出罪化运用等阻碍着检察机关后续开展刑事合规的职能发挥。立足于法律监督理论和组织责任中的法益可修复性,涉企职务犯罪刑事合规监检衔接具有相应的法理支撑。在《第三方意见》肯定监察机关具有对涉嫌行贿的企业适用第三方评估机制的建议权基础上,可进一步延伸监察机关参与职务犯罪刑事合规的职权,并对检察机关的介入程序予以明确,以促进涉案企业建立合规第三方评估机制,从而实现对职务犯罪的有效治理。

The criminal compliance of enterpriseinvolved duty crimes in China’s reform practice has achieved little due to the poor coordination between public authorities.The implementation of criminal compliance for duty crimes presupposes that the supervisory authority transfers the case to the procuratorial authority after the investigation is completed.However,limited compliance investigation periods and the decriminalization of supervisory measures for duty crimes hinder the procuratorial authority’s subsequent exercise of criminal compliance functions.Based on the theory of legal supervision and the reparability of legal interests in organizational responsibility,there is corresponding legal support for the supervision and inspection linkage of criminal compliance for enterpriseinvolved duty crimes.Building on the ThirdParty Opinions,which affirm the supervisory authority’s advisory role in applying a thirdparty assessment mechanism to companies suspected of bribery,the supervisory authority’s authority to participate in criminal compliance for duty crimes can be further extended.Additionally,clarifying the procedural involvement of the procuratorial authority can promote the establishment of compliant thirdparty assessment mechanisms by involved enterprises,thereby achieving effective governance of duty crimes.