摘要
在当代西方激进左翼阵营中,"谁之革命""何以革命"仍然是异议纷呈的关键问题且实质性地左右着马克思主义在西方的发展态势.身份政治作为一种现实的反抗运动,始终无法走出"主体的幻象";相反,生命政治批判在"去主体化"的同时,流于一种单纯的解构从而背离了现实的反抗.身份政治与生命政治基于各自的视角对马克思主义作出了单向度的阐发,客观上强化了马克思主义革命图式的双重进路.基于马克思的"革命主体性",二者之间外在的立场分歧可以内在地构成一种解释学循环.
In the contemporary western radical left camp,"whose revolution"and"how torevolutionize"are still a key issue with numerous objections,and substantially affect the development trend of Marxism in the West.Identity politics,as anactual resistance,has always been unable to avoidthe illusion of subject;on the con-trary,life political criticism is a pure deconstruction,which deviates from the actual resistance while de-subjec-ting.Identity politics and life politics,based on their respective perspectives,have formed a one-dimensionalex-planationto Marxism,and objectively enlarged the dual approaches of Marxist revolutionary schema.Based on Marx's revolutionary subjectivity,the external differences between them can form a hermeneutic cycle.
出处
《马克思主义哲学研究》
2023年第2期180-189,352,353,共12页
Marxist Philosophical Research
关键词
身份政治
生命政治
马克思
革命主体性
Identity Politics
Life Politics
Marx
Revolutionary Subjectivity