期刊文献+

微针刀治疗颈源性头痛的随机对照研究

Microneedling for cervicogenic headache:a randomized controlled trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究微针刀疗法对颈源性头痛的疗效和不良反应。方法 将60例颈源性头痛患者随机分为两组各30例,A组采用微针刀治疗4周,B组采用安慰针刀治疗4周。结果 干预4周后,A组现时疼痛强度评分(1.27±0.583)明显低于B组(3.37±0.765);A组颈部功能活动度评分(1.20±0.407)明显低于B组(2.47±0.681);A组的头痛持续时间(3.33±0.661)明显低于B组(5.30±0.988);A组的头痛频率(1.50±0.682)明显低于B组(2.73±0.691),且差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。随访时A组头痛持续时间(3.93±0.739)与头痛频率(1.96±0.556)明显低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。A组与B组的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论 微针刀治疗可以有效改善颈源性头痛患者的疼痛程度,减少头痛持续时间和头痛频率,改善颈椎的活动度,并且未出现严重不良反应,临床安全性高。 Objective To determine the efficacy of micro-needle knife therapy versus placebo(sham microneedle knife) for cervicogenic headache.Method A total of 60 eligible patients with cervicogenic headache were assigned to two groups with 30 cases in each group by using a random number table.Treatment group received micro-needle knife therapy and placebo group received sham micro-needle knife.Results After 4 weeks of intervention,the pain index score was significantly lower in the treatment group(1.27 ± 0.583) than that of the placebo group(3.37 ± 0.765);the cervical range of motion was significantly lower in the treatment group A(1.20 ± 0.407) than that of the placebo group(2.47 ± 0.681);the headache duration was significantly lower in the treatment group(3.33 ± 0.661) than that of the placebo group(5.30 ± 0.988);the headache frequency was significantly lower in the treatment group(1.50 ± 0.682) than that of the placebo group(2.73 ± 0.691),and the differences in the data of the two groups were statistically significant.The duration of headache(3.93 ± 0.739) and frequency of headache(1.96 ± 0.556) were significantly lower in the treatment group than that of the placebo group at follow-up,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05).The occurrence of adverse reactions was not statistically significant in the two groups(P > 0.05) Conclusions Micro-needle knife therapy could effectively improve the pain level of cervicogenic headache patients,reduce the headache duration and headache frequency,and improve the mobility of cervical spine.Acupuncture-related adverse events during treatment were infrequent in both groups and it′s safe for cervicogenic headache.
作者 傅丽颖 王海梁 吕慧娟 罗华送 李正祥 FU Liying;WANG Hailiang;LV Huijuan;LUO Huasong;LI Zhengxiang(Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,China;不详)
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第8期1167-1170,共4页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 浙江省自然科学基金社会公益发展项目(编号:LGF22H270015)。
关键词 微针刀 颈源性头痛 随机对照试验 安慰针刀 micro-needle knife cervicogenic headache randomized controlled trial placebo knife
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献97

  • 1姚新苗,陈于东,万全庆,刘海林.针刀合并手法治疗颈源性头痛临床研究[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2007,17(2):84-85. 被引量:6
  • 2李康仁,秦辉,陈坚,余彬,梁伟,邓宁.经皮激光汽化颈椎间盘减压术的临床应用[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2007,21(5):465-467. 被引量:6
  • 3吴明隆.结构方程模型:Amos的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:212-262.
  • 4Merboth MK,Bamason S.Managing pain:the fifth vital sign[J].NursClin North Am,2000,35(2):375-383.
  • 5肖军长.疼痛评估方法的优与劣[J].中国临床医药埽究杂志,2007:177.
  • 6Melzack R.The McGill Pain Questionnaire:major propertiesand scoring methods[J].Pain,1975,1(3):277-299.
  • 7Melzack R.The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire[J].Pain,1987,30(2):191-197.
  • 8Burckhardt CS,Bjelle A.A Swedish version of theshort-form McGill Pain Questionnaire[J].Scand J Rheumatol,1994,23(2):77-81.
  • 9Yakut Y,Yakut E,Bayar K,et al.Reliability and validityof the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnairein patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J].Clin Rheumatol,2007,Jul,26(7):1083-1087.
  • 10Menezes Costa Lda C,Maher CG,McAuley JH,et al.TheBrazilian-Portuguese versions of the McGill Pain Question-naire were reproducible,valid,and responsive in patientswith musculoskeletal pain[J].Clin Epidemiol,2011,64(8):903-912.

共引文献217

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部