期刊文献+

经皮椎间孔镜技术与传统后入路减压植骨融合内固定术治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效比较

Comparison of short-term efficacy between percutaneous intervertebral foramen technique and traditional posterior approach decompression and bone grafting and internal fixation in the treatment of senile degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较经皮椎间孔镜技术与传统后入路减压植骨融合内固定术治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的近期疗效。方法 我院2018年1月~2021年1月收治的老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症病人100例,根据不同手术方法将其分为观察组和对照组,每组各50例。观察组采用经皮椎间孔镜技术,对照组采用传统后入路减压植骨融合内固定术,比较两组临床疗效,围术期相关指标、腰椎功能、疼痛程度、骨代谢指标及并发症。结果 观察组手术时间、术后卧床时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中失血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,临床总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1周及术后3个月,观察组骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(BALP)、骨钙素(BGP)、骨形态发生蛋白-2(BMP-2)水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1周及术后3个月,观察组Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、日本骨科学会腰痛疾患评定表(JOA)评分高于对照组,视觉疼痛模拟(visual analogue scale, VAS)评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 经皮椎间孔镜治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症对病人创伤更小,利于恢复,安全性更高,治疗疗效良好。 Objective To compare the short-term efficacy of percutaneous foraminal endoscopy and traditional posterior decompression,bone grafting,fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of senile degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods 100 elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis admitted to Hainan Qionghai People’s Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the study subjects.They were divided into the observation group(50 case)and the control group(50 case)according to different surgical methods.The observation group used percutaneous foraminal endoscopy technology,and the control group used traditional posterior approach decompression and bone graft fusion internal fixation.Compare the clinical efficacy,perioperative related indicators,lumbar function,pain level,bone metabolism indicators,and complications between two groups.Results The observation group had shorter surgery,postoperative bed rest,and hospital stay compared to the control group,with less intraoperative blood loss compared to the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the total clinical effective rate was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);One week and three months after surgery,the levels of bone specific alkaline phosphatase(BALP),osteocalcin(BGP),and bone morphogenetic protein-2(BMP-2)in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05);At 1 week and 3 months after surgery,the Oswestry Dysfunction Index(ODI)and Japanese Orthopedic Society Low Back Pain Assessment Scale(JOA)scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,while the visual analog scale(VAS)score was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopy is less traumatic,beneficial for recovery,safer,and has a good therapeutic effect.
作者 杜壮文 欧阳帆 王恩梁 曾繁宽 DU Zhuangwen;OUYANG Fan;WANG Enliang;ZENG Fankuan(Department of Bone Disease Surgery,Qionghai City People’s Hospital of Hainan Province,Qionghai 571400,China)
出处 《临床外科杂志》 2024年第3期310-313,共4页 Journal of Clinical Surgery
关键词 经皮椎间孔镜技术 后入路减压植骨融合内固定术 退行性腰椎管狭窄症 percutaneous intervertebral foramen technique internal fixation with decompression and bone grafting through posterior approach lumbar spinal stenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献75

  • 1郭昭庆,陈仲强,李危石,曾岩,齐强,党耕町.腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的诊断与治疗[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):15-18. 被引量:26
  • 2Athiviraham A, Yen D. Is spinal stenosis better treated surgically or nonsurgically? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, 458:90-93.
  • 3Malrvaara A, Satis P, Hefiovaam M, et al. Surgical or nonowxative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randcontrolled trial. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32(1) :1-8.
  • 4Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. gical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(14) :1329-1338.
  • 5Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Ixtfie JD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Nfed, 2008, 358(8):794-810.
  • 6Park DK, An I-IS, Lurie JD, et al. Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes? A subanalysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(4) ,439-446.
  • 7Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal I-IJ, et al. spinal stenosis: oonservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(11) :1424-1435.
  • 8Marieonda M, Fava R, Gatto A, et al. Unilateral laninectomy for bilateral decompression of spinal stenosis: a prospective coratxtrative study with eorrvatively treated patients. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2302, 15(1):3%46.
  • 9Arinzon Z, A&msky A, Fidelman Z, et al. Outcomes d decompression surgery ~or lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Fur Spine J, 2004, 13(1): 32-37.
  • 10Arinzon Z, Fredman B, Zohar E, et al. Surgical management of spinal stenosis: a comparison of irrmaediate and long term outcome in two geriatric patient populations. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 21303, 36(3):273-279.

共引文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部