交通替代攻击问卷的修订与信效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Traffic Displaced Aggression Questionnaire in Chinese Drivers

目的 修订交通替代攻击问卷并检验其在我国驾驶员群体中的信效度.方法 采用交通替代攻击问卷对317 名驾驶员进行施测,共获得 305 份有效问卷.通过分析后得到修订版的中国交通替代攻击问卷.结果 修订后的交通替代攻击问卷共保留 24 个题目,累积方差贡献率 56.278%;该问卷的模型拟合度较好(GFI =0.870,IFI =0.920,TLI =0.911,NFI =0.860,CFI =0.919,RMSEA =0.062,χ2/df =2.148,SRMR = 0.045).问卷总的内部一致性系数为0.894,问卷各维度的内部一致性系数在0.677~0.936.问卷各维度与总分的相关系数在0.588~0.845 之间,且相关显著.问卷各维度与亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表之间部分相关显著,说明修订后的问卷具有良好的相容效度.结论 修订后的交通替代攻击问卷信度和效度较好,可以作为测量我国驾驶员交通替代攻击的一个可靠而有效的工具.

Objective To revise the Traffic Displaced Aggression Questionnaire(TDAQ)and test its reliability,validity and applicability in Chinese drivers.Methods A total of 305 valid questionnaires were obtained from 317 drivers using the Traffic Displaced Aggression Questionnaire(TDAQ).Through the analysis,the revised version of Chinese Traffic Displaced Questionnaire is obtained.ResultsThe questionnaire consisted of 24 subjects,the cumulative variance explained rate is 56.278;The indicators of confirmatory factor analysis met the requirements of psychometric(GFI=0.870,IFI=0.920,TLI=0.911,NFI=0.860,CFI=0.919,RMSEA=0.062,X/df=2.148,SRMR=0.045).The Cronbachsαof the whole questionnaire was 0.894,the internal consistency coefficient of each dimension of the questionnaire is 0.677~0.936.Pearson correlations between the scales and the whole questionnaire were from 0.588~0.845,and the correlation is significant.The dimensions of the questionnaire are partially related significantly correlated with the dimensions of the Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Inventory,indicating that the scales had good compatibility validity.Conclusion The reliability and validity of the revised TDAQ is better,and can be used as a tool to assess Chinese drivers'traffic displaced aggression.